Literature DB >> 12461364

Osteolysis: a disease of access to fixation interfaces.

Michael T Manley1, James A D'Antonio, William N Capello, Avram A Edidin.   

Abstract

Long-term clinical studies of total hip replacement suggest a direct relationship between bearing wear and periprosthetic osteolysis, particularly if polyethylene wear is greater than a threshold value of 0.1 mm per year. The current clinical trend to cross-linked polyethylene and hard-to-hard bearings attempts to ensure that bearing wear remains below this threshold. Fluid pressure generated in the hip during patient activity also has been implicated in the formation of periprosthetic lesions. Pressure fluctuation measured during manipulation of the hip at revision, or the identification of modular components that pump fluid during loading, suggest cyclic pressure may be a causative factor in bone resorption. Animal studies show the adverse effect of direct pressure on osteocytes. At more than 10 years followup, the low incidence of osteolytic lesions in retrospective reviews of successful cemented and cementless implant designs suggest that osteolysis is not an inevitable consequence of particle or pressure generation in the hip. If the quality of implant fixation prohibits fluid access to the surrounding bone, the rate of osteolysis is minimal. It is evident that whether the active factor in osteolysis is pressure, wear particles, or both, adverse periprosthetic effects can be minimized if access to the fixation interfaces in the hip is denied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461364     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200212000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Kouji Ito; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Wear particles: key to aseptic prosthetic loosening?].

Authors:  M Otto; J Kriegsmann; T Gehrke; S Bertz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Fluid pressure and flow as a cause of bone resorption.

Authors:  Anna Fahlgren; Mathias P G Bostrom; Xu Yang; Lars Johansson; Ulf Edlund; Fredrik Agholme; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Clinical and radiological results of hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups.

Authors:  J Blacha; J Gagała
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

6.  Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Lin Chen; Tiao Lin; An Liu; Ming-Min Shi; Bin Hu; Zhong-Li Shi; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Finite Element Analysis of porously punched prosthetic short stem virtually designed for simulative uncemented Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew Jian-Qiao Peng; Hai-Yan Chen; Yong Hu; XiangYang Ju; Bo Bai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gavin E Bartlett; David J Beard; David W Murray; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.