PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging for detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients known to have malignancy and suspected of having focal liver lesions at ultrasonography (US) underwent 1.0-T MR imaging with gradient-recalled-echo T1-weighted breath-hold sequences before, immediately after, and 60 minutes after Gd-BOPTA injection. Subsequently, MR imaging was performed with turbo spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery T2-weighted sequences before and 60 minutes after ferumoxides administration. All patients subsequently underwent intraoperative US within 15 days, and histopathologic analysis of their resected lesion-containing specimens was performed. Separate qualitative analyses were performed to assess lesion detection with each contrast agent. Quantitative analyses were performed by measuring signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) on pre- and postcontrast Gd-BOPTA and ferumoxides MR images. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank and Monte Carlo tests. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was superior to that of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection (P <.05). Ferumoxides MR images depicted 36 (97%) of 37 metastases detected at intraoperative US, whereas Gd-BOPTA MR images depicted 30 (81%) metastases during delayed phase and 20 (54%) during dynamic phase. All six metastases identified only at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging were 5-10 mm in diameter. There was a significant increase in CNR between the lesion and liver before and after ferumoxides administration (from 3.8 to 6.8, P <.001) but not before or after Gd-BOPTA injection (from -4.8 to -5.5, P >.05). CONCLUSION: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging seems to be superior to Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Copyright RSNA, 2002
PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging for detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients known to have malignancy and suspected of having focal liver lesions at ultrasonography (US) underwent 1.0-T MR imaging with gradient-recalled-echo T1-weighted breath-hold sequences before, immediately after, and 60 minutes after Gd-BOPTA injection. Subsequently, MR imaging was performed with turbo spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery T2-weighted sequences before and 60 minutes after ferumoxides administration. All patients subsequently underwent intraoperative US within 15 days, and histopathologic analysis of their resected lesion-containing specimens was performed. Separate qualitative analyses were performed to assess lesion detection with each contrast agent. Quantitative analyses were performed by measuring signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) on pre- and postcontrast Gd-BOPTA and ferumoxides MR images. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank and Monte Carlo tests. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was superior to that of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection (P <.05). Ferumoxides MR images depicted 36 (97%) of 37 metastases detected at intraoperative US, whereas Gd-BOPTA MR images depicted 30 (81%) metastases during delayed phase and 20 (54%) during dynamic phase. All six metastases identified only at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging were 5-10 mm in diameter. There was a significant increase in CNR between the lesion and liver before and after ferumoxides administration (from 3.8 to 6.8, P <.001) but not before or after Gd-BOPTA injection (from -4.8 to -5.5, P >.05). CONCLUSION:Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging seems to be superior to Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Copyright RSNA, 2002
Authors: Pier Paolo Mainenti; Federica Romano; Laura Pizzuti; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Lorenzo Mannelli; Massimo Imbriaco; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-07-28
Authors: Li Liu; T Kevin Hitchens; Qing Ye; Yijen Wu; Brent Barbe; Devin E Prior; Wendy F Li; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Lesley M Foley; Daniel J Bain; Chien Ho Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2013-02-08