Literature DB >> 12459727

Quantitative genetic analysis of natural populations.

Allen J Moore1, Penelope F Kukuk.   

Abstract

Quantitative genetic studies in natural populations have been rare because they require large breeding programmes or known pedigrees. The relatedness that has been estimated from molecular markers can now be used to substitute for breeding, allowing studies of previously inaccessible species. Many behavioural ecologists have a sufficient number of markers and study species with characteristics that are amenable to this approach. It is now time to combine studies of selection with studies of genetic variation for a more complete understanding of behavioural evolution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12459727     DOI: 10.1038/nrg951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  4 in total

1.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Postcranial Skeletal Differences in Free-Range and Captive-Born Primates.

Authors:  Luci Ann P Kohn; Gabriele R Lubach
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Using genomic prediction to detect microevolutionary change of a quantitative trait.

Authors:  D C Hunter; B Ashraf; C Bérénos; P A Ellis; S E Johnston; A J Wilson; J G Pilkington; J M Pemberton; J Slate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Phillip Gienapp; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.