Literature DB >> 12459215

May I have your attention, please: electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli.

N Kyle Smith1, John T Cacioppo, Jeff T Larsen, Tanya L Chartrand.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that negative stimuli elicit more attention than do positive stimuli. However, this research has relied on response-based measures to assess attention. The current research uses the P1 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) as a proximal index of attention allocation to valenced stimuli. In two studies, P1 amplitude was measured while participants evaluated positive and negative pictures. In both studies, principal components analysis showed that P1 amplitudes to frequent stimuli and to rare negative stimuli were larger than P1 amplitudes to rare positive stimuli. This is (a) evidence for the extremely rapid (<120 ms) differentiation of positive and negative stimuli and (b) process-based evidence for a negativity bias in attention allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12459215     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00147-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  102 in total

1.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural mechanisms underlying the higher levels of subjective well-being in extraverts: pleasant bias and unpleasant resistance.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Jinfu Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Jiemin Yang; Xianxin Meng; Qinglin Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: an ERP study of race and gender perception.

Authors:  Tiffany A Ito; Geoffrey R Urland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Emotional face processing and attention performance in three domains: neurophysiological mechanisms and moderating effects of trait anxiety.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis; Chao-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  The interaction between pictures and words: evidence from positivity offset and negativity bias.

Authors:  Baolin Liu; Zhixing Jin; Zhongning Wang; Yu Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Wenbo Luo; Wenfeng Feng; Weiqi He; Nai-Yi Wang; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Spencer K Lynn; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.