Literature DB >> 12458066

Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.

Stig Steen1, Qiuming Liao, Leif Pierre, Audrius Paskevicius, Trygve Sjöberg.   

Abstract

LUCAS is a new gas-driven CPR device providing automatic chest compression and active decompression. In an artificial thorax model, superior pressure and flow were obtained with LUCAS compared with manual CPR. In a randomized study on pigs with induced ventricular fibrillation significantly higher cardiac output, carotid artery blood flow, end-tidal CO(2), intrathoracic decompression-phase aortic- and coronary perfusion pressures were obtained with LUCAS-CPR (83% ROSC) compared to manual CPR (0% ROSC). In normothermic fibrillating pigs, the ROSC rate was 100% after 15 min and 38% after 60 min of LUCAS-CPR (no drug treatment). The ROSC rate increased to 75% if surface cooling to 34 degrees C was applied during the first 30 min of the 1-h resuscitation period. Experience with the first 20 patients has shown that LUCAS is light (6.5 kg), easy to handle, quick to apply (10-20 s), maintains a correct position, and works optimally during transport both on stretchers and in ambulances. In one hospital patient with a witnessed asystole where manual CPR failed, LUCAS-CPR achieved ROSC within 3 min. One year later the patient's mental capacity was fully intact. To conclude, LUCAS-CPR gives significantly better circulation during ventricular fibrillation than manual CPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458066     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00271-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  45 in total

1.  Feasibility of intra-arrest hypothermia induction: A novel nasopharyngeal approach achieves preferential brain cooling.

Authors:  Manuel Boller; Joshua W Lampe; Joseph M Katz; Denise Barbut; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using electrically driven devices: a review.

Authors:  Anatol Prinzing; Stefan Eichhorn; Marcus-André Deutsch; Ruediger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS2): a forensic autopsy study.

Authors:  Christelle Lardi; Coraline Egger; Robert Larribau; Marc Niquille; Patrice Mangin; Tony Fracasso
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  [Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].

Authors:  M Fischer; M Breil; M Ihli; M Messelken; S Rauch; J-C Schewe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Closed-loop controller for chest compressions based on coronary perfusion pressure: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Chunfei Wang; Guang Zhang; Taihu Wu; Ningbo Zhan; Yaling Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Prompt use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the MECCA study report.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Boon Lui Benjamin Ng; Shiang Hu Ang; Chun Yue Francis Lee; Siew Hon Benjamin Leong; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Antony Charles Rabind; Nagaraj Baglody Anjali; Ying Hao
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 7.  Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

Review 8. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

9.  Reduction of CPR artifacts in the ventricular fibrillation ECG by coherent line removal.

Authors:  Anton Amann; Andreas Klotz; Thomas Niederklapfer; Alexander Kupferthaler; Tobias Werther; Marcus Granegger; Wolfgang Lederer; Michael Baubin; Werner Lingnau
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Qiuming Liao; Trygve Sjöberg; Audrius Paskevicius; Björn Wohlfart; Stig Steen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.