Literature DB >> 12457757

Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition.

Ian G Dobbins1, Heather J Rice, Anthony D Wagner, Daniel L Schacter.   

Abstract

Episodic recognition can be based on recollection of contextual details, on a sense of recent encounter, or some combination of the two. According to several cognitive models, selectively attending to these distinct aspects of memory may require different retrieval orientations and result in different neural responses depending upon whether or not retrieval is successful. Using event-related fMRI, we examined retrieval orientation by having subjects discriminate between two test words in one of two manners. During source recollection, they selected the member of the pair previously associated with a particular encoding task. In contrast, recency judgment required selection of the most recently encountered item of the pair, regardless of how it had been encoded. Furthermore, successful and unsuccessful trials within each retrieval task were contrasted to determine whether retrieval success effects occurred in overlapping or dissimilar neural populations compared to those associated with each retrieval orientation. The results revealed distinct lateral prefrontal and parietal activations that distinguished attempted source recollection from judgments of relative recency; these orientation effects were largely independent of retrieval success. In contrast, medial temporal lobe structures (hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus) were differentially more active during successful recollection of encoding context, showing similar reduced responses during failed source recollection and judgments of recency. These results indicate that different memory orientations recruit distinct prefrontal and parietal networks and that the recovery of episodic context is associated with the hippocampus and surrounding medial temporal cortices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12457757     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00164-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  110 in total

1.  Reaction time, memory strength, and fMRI activity during memory retrieval: Hippocampus and default network are differentially responsive during recollection and familiarity judgments.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Richard J Clarke; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Age-related changes in right middle frontal gyrus volume correlate with altered episodic retrieval activity.

Authors:  M Natasha Rajah; Rafael Languay; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Distinct roles for lateral and medial anterior prefrontal cortex in contextual recollection.

Authors:  Jon S Simons; Sam J Gilbert; Adrian M Owen; Paul C Fletcher; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sleep enhances explicit recollection in recognition memory.

Authors:  Spyridon Drosopoulos; Ullrich Wagner; Jan Born
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  A dissociation of encoding and retrieval processes in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Laura L Eldridge; Stephen A Engel; Michael M Zeineh; Susan Y Bookheimer; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face-name associations: the rewarding power of a smile.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Unexpected novelty and familiarity orienting responses in lateral parietal cortex during recognition judgment.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Alex Konkel; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.