Literature DB >> 12457078

An economic evaluation of donepezil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: results of a 1-year, double-blind, randomized trial.

Anders Wimo1, Bengt Winblad, Knut Engedal, Hilkka Soininen, Frans Verhey, Gunhild Waldemar, Anna-Lena Wetterholm, Vera Mastey, Anders Haglund, Richard Zhang, Robert Miceli, Warren Chin, Ponni Subbiah.   

Abstract

The costs and consequences of donepezil versus placebo treatment in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) were evaluated as part of a 1-year prospective, double-blind, randomized, multinational clinical trial. Patients received either donepezil (n = 142; 5 mg/day for 28 days followed by 10 mg/day according to the clinician's judgement) or placebo (n = 144). Unit costs were assessed in 1999 Swedish kronas (SEK) and converted to US dollars (USD). Donepezil-treated patients gained functional benefits relative to placebo on the Progressive Deterioration Scale (p = 0.042) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (p = 0.025) at week 52. Caregivers of donepezil-treated patients spent an average of 400 h less annually providing care than caregivers of placebo-treated patients. Mean annual healthcare costs were SEK 137,752 (USD 16,438) per patient for the donepezil group and SEK 135,314 (USD 16,147) in the placebo group. With the average annual cost of donepezil at SEK 10,723 (USD 1,280) per patient, the SEK 2,438 (USD 291) cost difference represented a 77% cost offset. When caregiver time and healthcare costs were included, mean annual costs were SEK 209,244 (USD 24,969) per patient in the donepezil group and SEK 218,434 (USD 26,066) in the placebo group, a total saving associated with donepezil treatment of SEK 9,190 (USD 1,097) per patient [95% CI of SEK -43,959 (USD -5,246), SEK 25,581 (USD 3,053); p = 0.6]. The positive effects on the efficacy outcome measures combined with no additional costs from a societal perspective indicate that donepezil is a cost-effective treatment, representing an improved strategy for the management of patients with AD. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12457078     DOI: 10.1159/000066669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord        ISSN: 1420-8008            Impact factor:   2.959


  26 in total

1.  The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community-living patients with dementia.

Authors:  A Wimo; L Jonsson; A Zbrozek
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Novel approaches to incorporating pharmacoeconomic studies into phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Fillit; J Cummings; P Neumann; T McLaughlin; P Salavtore; C Leibman
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the management of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Colin Green; Joanna Picot; Emma Loveman; Andrea Takeda; Jo Kirby; Andrew Clegg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Disease progression and costs of care in Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil: a longitudinal naturalistic cohort.

Authors:  Anders Gustavsson; Linus Jönsson; Johan Parmler; Niels Andreasen; Carina Wattmo; Åsa K Wallin; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-08-06

Review 5.  The economic impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: can drugs ease the burden?

Authors:  Daniel L Murman; Christopher C Colenda
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Guidelines for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease from the Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics.

Authors:  Carlo Caltagirone; Angelo Bianchetti; Monica Di Luca; Patrizia Mecocci; Alessandro Padovani; Elvezio Pirfo; Pierluigi Scapicchio; Umberto Senin; Marco Trabucchi; Massimo Musicco
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Treating patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: implications of recent pharmacologic studies.

Authors:  Concetta M Forchetti
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2005

8.  Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.

Authors:  Alan G Wade; José-Luis Fernández; Clément François; Karina Hansen; Natalya Danchenko; Nicolas Despiegel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Colin Green
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Economic considerations in the management of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carolyn W Zhu; Mary Sano
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.