Literature DB >> 12455078

Effects of microvascular dysfunction on myocardial fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Koichi Tamita1, Takashi Akasaka, Tsutomu Takagi, Atsushi Yamamuro, Kenji Yamabe, Minako Katayama, Shigefumi Morioka, Kiyoshi Yoshida.   

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a lesion-specific index of the functional severity of coronary stenosis in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. As the coronary blood flow in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with microvascular damage is restricted, the pressure drop across the stenosis during hyperemia may be smaller than expected. However, the effects of microvascular dysfunction on FFR in AMI patients remain undetermined. The study comprised 33 AMI patients who underwent coronary stenting within 12 hr of onset, and 15 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent elective stenting. Assessment of the 48 lesions by means of intravascular ultrasound and pressure measurements after stenting showed that postinterventional FFR was higher in AMI than angina pectoris patients (0.95 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.04; P = 0.002), although there were no significant differences in intravascular ultrasound parameters. AMI patients were divided into two subgroups based on their postprocedural Thrombolysis on Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade (23 patients with TIMI 3 and 10 with TIMI 2). There were no differences in intravascular ultrasound parameters between the AMI subgroups, while FFR was greater in the patients with TIMI 2 than in those with TIMI 3 (0.98 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.05; P = 0.017). No significant correlation was found between FFR and intravascular ultrasound parameters in either AMI subgroup, while FFR of more than 0.94 was observed in all TIMI 2 cases independent of residual stenosis severity. We conclude that in patients with marked microvascular dysfunction, FFR may not be reliable for the assessment of coronary lesion severity and may underestimate coronary lesion severity. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12455078     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  17 in total

1.  Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki; Ai Masukawa; Satoru Morita; Kazufumi Suzuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Combined functional and anatomical diagnostic endpoints for assessing arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

Authors:  Ehsan Rajabi-Jaghargh; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Jiani Tang; Jiapeng Chu; Hanjing Hou; Yan Lai; Shengxian Tu; Fei Chen; Yian Yao; Zi Ye; Yanhua Gao; Yu Mao; Shaowei Zhuang; Xuebo Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 5.  Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes: A review.

Authors:  Nikunj R Shah; Rasha Al-Lamee; Justin Davies
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2014-11-11

6.  Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Microvascular Dysfunction in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yong-Soo Baek; Sang-Don Park; Soo-Han Kim; Man-Jong Lee; Sung-Hee Shin; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Jun Kwan; Keum-Soo Park; Seong-Ill Woo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio.

Authors:  Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Rajesh Sachdeva; Florim Cuculi; Javier Escaned; Christopher Broyd; Nicolas Foin; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Rodney A Foale; Iqbal Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Amarjit S Sethi; Mahmud Al-Bustami; Raffi R Kaprielian; Masood A Khan; Christopher S Baker; Michael F Bellamy; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Carlo Di Mario; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Comparison of Approaches to Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Rajat Kalra; Himanshu Aggarwal; Sameer Ather; Saurabh Gaba; Garima Arora; David C McGiffin; Mustafa Ahmed; Stella Aslibekyan; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses in acute coronary syndromes using pressure guidewire.

Authors:  Giampaolo Niccoli; Ciro Indolfi; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-06-14

10.  Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases.

Authors:  Rupak K Banerjee; Sruthi Ramadurai; Shreyash M Manegaonkar; Marepalli B Rao; Sathyaprabha Rakkimuthu; Mohamed A Effat
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.