Literature DB >> 12452221

Remifentanil vs morphine for patients in intensive care unit who need short-term mechanical ventilation.

Thimima Chinachoti1, Peter Kessler, Andrew Kirkham, Thewarug Werawatganon.   

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind study compared the safety and efficacy of remifentanil (9 microg/ kg/h) with morphine (0.045 mg/kg/h plus a bolus dose of 0.025 mg/kg). One hundred and eighty nine Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this study. A pre-defined dosing algorithm permitted initial titration of the opioids to predetermine the optimal level of sedation and pain score. Supplementary infusion of midazolam (0.03 mg/kg/h) was given when additional sedation was required. The duration of optimal sedation during the maintenance phase was 82.7 per cent and 84.3 per cent of the total time in the remifentanil and morphine groups respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the between-subject variability in the duration of optimal sedation between the two treatment groups. Midazolam was not required in approximately 75 per cent of all patients. The patients in the morphine group required twice the amount of midazolam required by the remifentanil group. The dosing algorithm facilitated rapid extubation in both groups. Remifentanil provided comparable hemodynamic stability to morphine, and was not associated with an increase in cardiovascular adverse event. Remifentanil is therefore considered to be effective and well tolerated in ICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of sedative agents in head-injured adults.

Authors:  Susan C Urwin; David K Menon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Spotlight on remifentanil: its analgesic and sedative use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing remifentanil with fentanyl in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Claudia Spies; Martin Macguill; Anja Heymann; Christina Ganea; Daniel Krahne; Angelika Assman; Heinrich-Rudolf Kosiek; Kathrin Scholtz; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Jörg Martin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.

Authors:  Frédéric Ethuin; Said Boudaoud; Isabelle Leblanc; Christian Troje; Olivier Marie; Jean-Claude Levron; Jean-Pierre Le Moing; Patrice Assoune; Benoit Eurin; Laurent Jacob
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Remifentanil : a review of its analgesic and sedative use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Could remifentanil reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in comparison with other opioids for mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yibing Zhu; Yinhua Wang; Bin Du; Xiuming Xi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  The incidence of sub-optimal sedation in the ICU: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel L Jackson; Clare W Proudfoot; Kimberley F Cann; Tim S Walsh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.