Literature DB >> 12447521

Progression rate of self-propelled feeding tubes in critically ill patients.

Mette M Berger1, Marc D Bollmann, Jean-Pierre Revelly, M-Christine Cayeux, Nathalie Pilon, David Bracco, René L Chioléro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gaining postpyloric access in ventilated, sedated ICU patients usually requires time-consuming procedures such as endoscopy. Recently, a feeding tube has been introduced that migrates spontaneously into the jejunum in surgical patients. The study aimed at assessing the rate of migration of this tube in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective descriptive trial.
SETTING: Surgical ICU in a tertiary University Hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and five consecutive surgical ICU patients requiring enteral feeding were enrolled, resulting in 128 feeding-tube placement attempts.
METHODS: A self-propelled tube was used and followed up for 3 days: progression was assessed by daily contrast-injected X-ray. Severity of illness was assessed with SAPS II and organ failure assessed with SOFA score.
RESULTS: The patients were aged 55+/-19 years (mean+/-SD) with SAPS II score of 45+/-18. Of the 128 tube placement attempts, 12 could not be placed in the stomach; eight were accidentally pulled out while in gastric position due to the necessity to avoid fixation during the progression phase. Among organ failures, respiratory failure predominated, followed by cardiovascular. By day 3, the postpyloric progression rate was 63/128 tubes (49%). There was no association between migration and age, or SAPS II score, but the progression rate was significantly poorer in patients with hemodynamic failure. Use of norepinephrine and morphine were negatively associated with tube progression (P<0.001), while abdominal surgery was not. In ten patients, jejunal tubes were placed by endoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Self-propelled feeding tubes progressed from the stomach to the postpyloric position in 49% of patients, reducing the number of endoscopic placements: these tubes may facilitate enteral nutrient delivery in the ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447521     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1544-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  13 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Nasogastric or nasointestinal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Matteo Piciucchi; Elettra Merola; Massimo Marignani; Marianna Signoretti; Roberto Valente; Lucia Cocomello; Flavia Baccini; Francesco Panzuto; Gabriele Capurso; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  [Nasojejunal enteral feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Successful placement without technical assistance].

Authors:  S Schröder; S van Hülst; W Raabe; B Bein; A Wolny; T von Spiegel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparison of a new unguided self-advancing jejunal tube with the endoscopic guided technique: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Reinhard Kitzberger; Andja Bojic; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Thomas Staudinger; Christian Madl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Metoclopramide or domperidone improves post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Bei Hu; Heng Ye; Cheng Sun; Yichen Zhang; Zhigang Lao; Fanghong Wu; Zhaohui Liu; Linxi Huang; Changchun Qu; Lewu Xian; Hao Wu; Yingjie Jiao; Junling Liu; Juyu Cai; Weiying Chen; Zhiqiang Nie; Zaiyi Liu; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.

Authors:  Bo Lv; Linhui Hu; Lifang Chen; Bei Hu; Yanlin Zhang; Heng Ye; Cheng Sun; Xiunong Zhang; Huilan Lan; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Bei Hu; Xin Ouyang; Liming Lei; Cheng Sun; Ruibin Chi; Jian Guo; Wenlong Guo; Yanlin Zhang; Yong Li; Daoyong Huang; Huafeng Sun; Zhiqiang Nie; Jieyang Yu; Yuan Zhou; Hao Wang; Jinhe Zhang; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Intravenous Metoclopramide to Improve the Success Rate of Blind Bedside Post-pyloric Placement of Feeding Tube in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sirima Ketsuwan; Pornthep Tanpowpong; Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn; Supatra Phaopant; Nattanicha Suppalarkbunlue; Chula Kooanantkul; Nattachai Anantasit; Jarin Vaewpanich
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  Is metoclopramide beneficial for the postpyloric placement of nasoenteric tubes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xin Ouyang; Rong Qu; Bei Hu; Yifan Wang; Fen Yao; Bo Lv; Cheng Sun; Yiyu Deng; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.204

10.  Experience in Bedside Placement, Clinical Validity, and Cost-Efficacy of a Self-Propelled Nasojejunal Feeding Tube.

Authors:  Carolina Puiggròs; Rosa Molinos; M Dolors Ortiz; Montserrat Ribas; Carlos Romero; Concepcion Vázquez; Hegoi Segurola; Rosa Burgos
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.080

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.