Literature DB >> 20677342

Nasogastric or nasointestinal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis.

Matteo Piciucchi1, Elettra Merola, Massimo Marignani, Marianna Signoretti, Roberto Valente, Lucia Cocomello, Flavia Baccini, Francesco Panzuto, Gabriele Capurso, Gianfranco Delle Fave.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the rate of spontaneous tube migration and to compare the effects of naso-gastric and naso-intestinal (NI) (beyond the ligament of Treitz) feeding in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).
METHODS: After bedside intragastric insertion, tube position was assessed, and enteral nutrition (EN) started at day 4, irrespective of tube localization. Patients were monitored daily and clinical and laboratory parameters evaluated to compare the outcome of patients with nasogastric (NG) or NI tube.
RESULTS: Spontaneous tube migration to a NI site occurred in 10/25 (40%) prospectively enrolled SAP patients, while in 15 (60%) nutrition was started with a NG tube. Groups were similar for demographics and pancreatitis aetiology but computed tomography (CT) severity index was higher in NG tube patients than in NI (mean 6.2 vs 4.7, P = 0.04). The CT index seemed a risk factor for failed obtainment of spontaneous distal migration. EN trough NG or NI tube were similar in terms of tolerability, safety, clinical goals, complications and hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Spontaneous distal tube migration is successful in 40% of SAP patients, with higher CT severity index predicting intragastric retention; in such cases EN by NG tubes seems to provide a pragmatic alternative opportunity with similar outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20677342      PMCID: PMC2915430          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i29.3692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

1.  Early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nasojejunal and nasogastric routes.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Namrata Singh; Shyam Prakash; Anoop Saraya; Yogendra Kumar Joshi
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Nasogastric tube feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review of the literature to determine safety and tolerance.

Authors:  Maxim S Petrov; M Isabel T D Correia; John A Windsor
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2008-07-10

3.  [AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis].

Authors:  Chris E Forsmark; John Baillie
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Mex       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Physiological response of the human pancreas to enteral and parenteral feeding.

Authors:  Steven J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: a survey of practices in canadian intensive care units.

Authors:  Jan K Greenwood; Heather Y Lovelace; Stephen A McClave
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  A new technique for placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using external magnetic guidance.

Authors:  S A Gabriel; R J Ackermann; M R Castresana
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  F C Eatock; P Chong; N Menezes; L Murray; C J McKay; C R Carter; C W Imrie
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Early nasogastric enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kun Jiang; Xin-Zu Chen; Qing Xia; Wen-Fu Tang; Lei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Systematic review: nutritional support in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  M S Petrov; R D Pylypchuk; N V Emelyanov
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Enteral nutrition during acute pancreatitis: feasibility study of a self-propeeling spiral distal end jejunal tube.

Authors:  David Karsenti; Jérôme Viguier; Pascal Bourlier; Louis d'alteroche; Jean-Pierre Barbieux; Etienne-Henry Metman; Etienne Dorval
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2003-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Heming Quan; Xingpeng Wang; Chuanyong Guo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.260

2.  Intravenous Metoclopramide to Improve the Success Rate of Blind Bedside Post-pyloric Placement of Feeding Tube in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sirima Ketsuwan; Pornthep Tanpowpong; Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn; Supatra Phaopant; Nattanicha Suppalarkbunlue; Chula Kooanantkul; Nattachai Anantasit; Jarin Vaewpanich
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Dutta; Ashish Goel; Richard Kirubakaran; Ashok Chacko; Prathap Tharyan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-sui Chang; Hua-qun Fu; Yuan-mei Xiao; Ji-chun Liu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Experience in Bedside Placement, Clinical Validity, and Cost-Efficacy of a Self-Propelled Nasojejunal Feeding Tube.

Authors:  Carolina Puiggròs; Rosa Molinos; M Dolors Ortiz; Montserrat Ribas; Carlos Romero; Concepcion Vázquez; Hegoi Segurola; Rosa Burgos
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.080

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.