Literature DB >> 12446848

Information optimization in coupled audio-visual cortical maps.

Mehran Kardar1, A Zee.   

Abstract

Barn owls hunt in the dark by using cues from both sight and sound to locate their prey. This task is facilitated by topographic maps of the external space formed by neurons (e.g., in the optic tectum) that respond to visual or aural signals from a specific direction. Plasticity of these maps has been studied in owls forced to wear prismatic spectacles that shift their visual field. Adaptive behavior in young owls is accompanied by a compensating shift in the response of (mapped) neurons to auditory signals. We model the receptive fields of such neurons by linear filters that sample correlated audio-visual signals and search for filters that maximize the gathered information while subject to the costs of rewiring neurons. Assuming a higher fidelity of visual information, we find that the corresponding receptive fields are robust and unchanged by artificial shifts. The shape of the aural receptive field, however, is controlled by correlations between sight and sound. In response to prismatic glasses, the aural receptive fields shift in the compensating direction, although their shape is modified due to the costs of rewiring.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446848      PMCID: PMC138535          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.252472699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  How the visual projection map instructs the auditory computational map.

Authors:  J H Kaas; T A Hackett
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-05-29       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Adaptive axonal remodeling in the midbrain auditory space map.

Authors:  W M DeBello; D E Feldman; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Understanding the efficiency of human perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1988-09-26       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Visual instruction of the neural map of auditory space in the developing optic tectum.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M S Brainard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sensitive periods for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Registration of neural maps through value-dependent learning: modeling the alignment of auditory and visual maps in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  M Rucci; G Tononi; G M Edelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Early auditory experience aligns the auditory map of space in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules.

Authors:  M Sigman; G A Cecchi; C D Gilbert; M O Magnasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Hebbian learning rule mediates asymmetric plasticity in aligning sensory representations.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Eric I Knudsen; Haim Sompolinsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.