Literature DB >> 18525023

A Hebbian learning rule mediates asymmetric plasticity in aligning sensory representations.

Ilana B Witten1, Eric I Knudsen, Haim Sompolinsky.   

Abstract

In the brain, mutual spatial alignment across different sensory representations can be shaped and maintained through plasticity. Here, we use a Hebbian model to account for the synaptic plasticity that results from a displacement of the space representation for one input channel relative to that of another, when the synapses from both channels are equally plastic. Surprisingly, although the synaptic weights for the two channels obeyed the same Hebbian learning rule, the amount of plasticity exhibited by the respective channels was highly asymmetric and depended on the relative strength and width of the receptive fields (RFs): the channel with the weaker or broader RFs always exhibited most or all of the plasticity. A fundamental difference between our Hebbian model and most previous models is that in our model synaptic weights were normalized separately for each input channel, ensuring that the circuit would respond to both sensory inputs. The model produced three distinct regimes of plasticity dynamics (winner-take-all, mixed-shift, and no-shift), with the transition between the regimes depending on the size of the spatial displacement and the degree of correlation between the sensory channels. In agreement with experimental observations, plasticity was enhanced by the accumulation of incremental adaptive adjustments to a sequence of small displacements. These same principles would apply not only to the maintenance of spatial registry across input channels, but also to the experience-dependent emergence of aligned representations in developing circuits.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18525023      PMCID: PMC2525701          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00013.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Incremental training increases the plasticity of the auditory space map in adult barn owls.

Authors:  Brie A Linkenhoker; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Multiple sites of adaptive plasticity in the owl's auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  William M DeBello; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The interplay between homeostatic synaptic plasticity and functional dendritic compartments.

Authors:  Ithai Rabinowitch; Idan Segev
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Eye-specific termination bands in tecta of three-eyed frogs.

Authors:  M Constantine-Paton; M I Law
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Formation of topographic maps.

Authors:  S B Udin; J W Fawcett
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Dynamics of visually guided auditory plasticity in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Plasticity in the tectum of Xenopus laevis: binocular maps.

Authors:  S B Udin; S Grant
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Moving visual stimuli rapidly induce direction sensitivity of developing tectal neurons.

Authors:  Florian Engert; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang; Mu-ming Poo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptron learning rule derived from spike-frequency adaptation and spike-time-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Prashanth D'Souza; Shih-Chii Liu; Richard H R Hahnloser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual modulation of auditory responses in the owl inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Joseph F Bergan; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A computational study of multisensory maturation in the superior colliculus (SC).

Authors:  Cristiano Cuppini; Barry E Stein; Benjamin A Rowland; Elisa Magosso; Mauro Ursino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  New perspectives on the owl's map of auditory space.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A neural network model of ventriloquism effect and aftereffect.

Authors:  Elisa Magosso; Cristiano Cuppini; Mauro Ursino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.