Literature DB >> 12446158

Differentiating temporal electromyographic waveforms between those with chronic low back pain and healthy controls.

C L Hubley-Kozey1, M J Vezina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Temporal activation patterns from abdominal and lumbar muscles were compared between healthy control subjects and those with chronic low back pain. STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative study.
BACKGROUND: Synergist and antagonist coactivity has been considered an important neuromuscular control strategy to maintain spinal stability. Differences in onset times and amplitudes have been reported from trunk muscle EMG recordings between healthy subjects and those with low back pain;however, evaluating temporal EMG waveforms should demonstrate whether differences exist in the ability of those with and those without low back pain to respond to changing perturbations.
METHODS: The Karhunen-Loève expansion was applied to the ensemble-average EMG profiles recorded from four abdominal and three trunk extensor muscle sites while subjects performed a leg-lifting task aimed at challenging lumbar spine stability. The principal patterns were derived and the weighting coefficients for each pattern were the main dependent variables in a series of two-factor (group and muscle) mixed ANOVA models.
RESULTS: Three principal patterns explained 96% of the variance in the temporal EMG profiles. The ANOVAs revealed statistically significant group and muscle main effects (P<0.05) for the principal pattern and significant group by muscle interactions (P<0.05) for patterns two and three. Post hoc analysis showed that patterns were not different among all muscle sites for the healthy controls, but differences were significant for the low back pain group.
CONCLUSIONS: The healthy group coactivated all seven sites with the same temporal pattern of activation. The low back pain group used different activation patterns indicative of a lack of synergistic coactivitation among the muscle sites examined. RELEVANCE: These results provide a foundation for developing a diagnostic classifier of neuromuscular impairment associated with low back pain, that could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to improve muscle coactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446158     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  17 in total

1.  The use of non-amplitude components of the myoelectric signal in identifying differences in function between the low back injured and controls.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-09

2.  Directed attention alters the temporal activation patterns of back extensors during trunk flexion-extension in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Christian Lariviere; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; Michael J L Sullivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain use a trunk stiffening strategy to maintain upright posture.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Sharon M Henry; Christine C Raasch; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control.

Authors:  Claudine J C Lamoth; Onno G Meijer; Andreas Daffertshofer; Paul I J M Wuisman; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  EMG analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risk of low-back pain.

Authors:  Abbas Heydari; Antoni V F Nargol; Anthony P C Jones; Anthony R Humphrey; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Altered breathing patterns during lumbopelvic motor control tests in chronic low back pain: a case-control study.

Authors:  Nathalie Roussel; Jo Nijs; Steven Truijen; Liesbet Vervecken; Sarah Mottram; Gaëtane Stassijns
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  The Biomechanics of the Modern Golf Swing: Implications for Lower Back Injuries.

Authors:  Michael H Cole; Paul N Grimshaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The Automatic Detection of Chronic Pain-Related Expression: Requirements, Challenges and the Multimodal EmoPain Dataset.

Authors:  Min S H Aung; Sebastian Kaltwang; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Brais Martinez; Aneesha Singh; Matteo Cella; Michel Valstar; Hongying Meng; Andrew Kemp; Moshen Shafizadeh; Aaron C Elkins; Natalie Kanakam; Amschel de Rothschild; Nick Tyler; Paul J Watson; Amanda C de C Williams; Maja Pantic; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 10.506

10.  The feasibility of measuring the activation of the trunk muscles in healthy older adults during trunk stability exercises.

Authors:  Edwin Y Hanada; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; Melissa D McKeon; Sarah A Gordon
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.