Literature DB >> 12446035

Fixation behavior while walking: persons with central visual field loss.

Kathleen A Turano1, Duane R Geruschat, Frank H Baker.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of central visual field loss (CFL) on fixation patterns of a person walking towards a target. Subjects were four visually normal persons and 10 persons with CFL. Eye position on scene was recorded and classified into 20 scene categories. The distributions of fixations among scene categories were compared across the two subject groups. For all but two CFL subjects, who fixated primarily at the floor, the distributions of fixations for the CFL subjects ranged from being moderately to strongly correlated with that of the visually normal mean. An analysis of the similarity in the sequence of fixations (or gaze pattern) of the CFL subjects to the visually normal subjects showed a range of 7-66%. Excluding the one CFL subject who had a functioning fovea, sequence similarity was strongly correlated with the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). The better a person's logMAR, the more closely his or her gaze pattern matched that of the visually normal subjects. Finally, the CFL data were tested against two current models of oculomotor strategy, visual salience and guided search. Similar to what was found with visually normal subjects, CFL subjects appear to use the expected features and general location of the target to guide their fixations, the guided-search strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446035     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00299-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Meghan E Riley; Kristin N Kelly; Mary Hayhoe; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Use of multiple preferred retinal loci in Stargardt's disease during natural tasks: a case study.

Authors:  Brian Sullivan; Jelena Jovancevic-Misic; Mary Hayhoe; Gwen Sterns
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Gaze anticipation during human locomotion.

Authors:  Delphine Bernardin; Hideki Kadone; Daniel Bennequin; Thomas Sugar; Mohamed Zaoui; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Gaze shifts and fixations dominate gaze behavior of walking cats.

Authors:  T J Rivers; M G Sirota; A I Guttentag; D A Ogorodnikov; N A Shah; I N Beloozerova
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Functional visual fields: a cross-sectional UK study to determine which visual field paradigms best reflect difficulty with mobility function.

Authors:  Hikmat Subhi; Keziah Latham; Joy Myint; Michael Crossland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Visuomotor control of human adaptive locomotion: understanding the anticipatory nature.

Authors:  Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-16

8.  Change in visual perception and balance caused by different types of hat.

Authors:  Hyolyun Roh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.