Literature DB >> 12442917

Investigations with FDG-PET scanning in prostate cancer show limited value for clinical practice.

Eeva Salminen1, Annette Hogg, David Binns, Mark Frydenberg, Rodney Hicks.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) imaging in the management of prostate cancer. Twenty-two patients were studied during different disease phases of prostate cancer, for staging or restaging to clarify specific clinical questions. FDG-PET was performed encompassing the thorax, abdomen and pelvis using the Penn PET 300H scanner. Scanning was begun 60 min after 18F fluorodeoxyglucose marker. Patients were catheterized and administered diuretics to minimize urinary activity. Information obtained with FDG-PET was concordant with findings from other investigations in 7/22 (32%) patients, discordant in 15/22 (68%) patients and equivalent in one patient (4%). PET indicated progressive disease in five patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 4 ng/L. The impact on management of the patients was high in 46% of cases, low in 41% and for 14% there was no impact on management. The accuracy of FDG-PET was 72% (95% CI 50-89) as confirmed by invasive diagnostics/follow-up. FDG-PET can provide useful information and improve the clinician's decision on further management procedures in selected patients with low PSA and bone or lymph node changes. A negative PET scan in prostate cancer should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12442917     DOI: 10.1080/028418602320405005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  39 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-04-01

3.  The Utility of [18F]DASA-23 for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Corinne Beinat; Tom Haywood; Yun-Sheng Chen; Chirag B Patel; Israt S Alam; Surya Murty; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Amirali Salmasi; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Influx rate of 18F-fluoroaminosuberic acid reflects cystine/glutamate antiporter expression in tumour xenografts.

Authors:  Kathinka E Pitman; Santosh R Alluri; Alexander Kristian; Eva-Katrine Aarnes; Heidi Lyng; Patrick J Riss; Eirik Malinen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  PET of Glucose Metabolism and Cellular Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Production of hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]malate from [1,4-13C2]fumarate is a marker of cell necrosis and treatment response in tumors.

Authors:  Ferdia A Gallagher; Mikko I Kettunen; De-En Hu; Pernille R Jensen; René In 't Zandt; Magnus Karlsson; Anna Gisselsson; Sarah K Nelson; Timothy H Witney; Sarah E Bohndiek; Georg Hansson; Torben Peitersen; Mathilde H Lerche; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Characterization of osteolytic, osteoblastic, and mixed lesions in a prostate cancer mouse model using 18F-FDG and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Mandeep S Virk; Brian T Feeley; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.