Literature DB >> 12437531

Determinants in APD selection.

Jimmy Wilson1, Allen R Nissenson.   

Abstract

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is the most prevalent form of peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Optimizing the success of this treatment requires appropriate patient selection; however, there are few data available on which patients are most likely to benefit the most from this form of therapy. The key factors to evaluate when APD is being considered include patient preferences and lifestyle, patient age, solute transport characteristics, residual renal function (RRF), cost, dialysis adequacy targets, and the potential for complications of therapy. Patients who prefer home dialysis at night, children, those with high average or high peritoneal transport characteristics, and those with significant RRF are ideal candidates for APD. Because of the flexibility that is possible in prescribing this form of dialysis, APD can be successfully performed in individuals who do not meet this ideal profile, and it can be an excellent form of dialysis, particularly as part of an integrated care program for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12437531     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2002.00097.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  7 in total

1.  Market Competition and Health Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Yuanchao Zheng; Vivian Ho; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jay Bhattacharya; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of Blood Pressure Control and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD).

Authors:  Jong Soon Jang; Soon Kil Kwon; Hye-Young Kim
Journal:  Electrolyte Blood Press       Date:  2011-06-30

3.  Peritoneal phosphate clearance is influenced by peritoneal dialysis modality, independent of peritoneal transport characteristics.

Authors:  Sunil V Badve; Deborah L Zimmerman; Greg A Knoll; Kevin D Burns; Brendan B McCormick
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Comparison of volume overload with cycler-assisted versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Sara N Davison; Gian S Jhangri; Kailash Jindal; Neesh Pannu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  K S Rabindranath; J Adams; T Z Ali; A M MacLeod; L Vale; J Cody; S A Wallace; C Daly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 6.  Residual renal function in children treated with chronic peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Maria Roszkowska-Blaim; Piotr Skrzypczyk
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-24

Review 7.  APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all.

Authors:  Athanasios Roumeliotis; Stefanos Roumeliotis; Konstantinos Leivaditis; Marios Salmas; Theodoros Eleftheriadis; Vassilios Liakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.