OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a stratification system for patients with diabetes mellitus according to severity of illness and care requirements and to correlate severity of illness with total medical and pharmaceutical costs of care. STUDY DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND METHODS: A cohort of 697 patients with diabetes mellitus was followed in a diabetes clinic under a managed care plan. Patients were stratified according to severity of illness in 6 clinical areas: glycemic control, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease/peripheral neuropathy, eye disease, renal disease, and autonomic neuropathy. Stratification was based on clinical elements in patients' medical records related to diabetes mellitus care and its comorbidities. Total medical and pharmaceutical costs were identified for 508 patients who participated in the managed care program for at least 8 months. RESULTS: Patients in high- and very high-risk categories for cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease/peripheral neuropathy, eye disease, and renal disease had markedly increased medical and pharmaceutical costs compared with those in low-risk categories. Pharmaceutical costs for patients in the glycemic control clinical area show a trend toward lower costs at higher risk. Pregnancy and depression were also associated with markedly increased healthcare costs. Patients who were in multiple high- and very high-risk categories had dramatically increased medical costs, as much as 10-fold those of patients who were in none of these categories. CONCLUSIONS: A diabetes mellitus-specific risk stratification system related to required care intensity can be used to identify patients with high medical costs and can enable care providers to select patients for case management and triage into specific care programs.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a stratification system for patients with diabetes mellitus according to severity of illness and care requirements and to correlate severity of illness with total medical and pharmaceutical costs of care. STUDY DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND METHODS: A cohort of 697 patients with diabetes mellitus was followed in a diabetes clinic under a managed care plan. Patients were stratified according to severity of illness in 6 clinical areas: glycemic control, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease/peripheral neuropathy, eye disease, renal disease, and autonomic neuropathy. Stratification was based on clinical elements in patients' medical records related to diabetes mellitus care and its comorbidities. Total medical and pharmaceutical costs were identified for 508 patients who participated in the managed care program for at least 8 months. RESULTS:Patients in high- and very high-risk categories for cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease/peripheral neuropathy, eye disease, and renal disease had markedly increased medical and pharmaceutical costs compared with those in low-risk categories. Pharmaceutical costs for patients in the glycemic control clinical area show a trend toward lower costs at higher risk. Pregnancy and depression were also associated with markedly increased healthcare costs. Patients who were in multiple high- and very high-risk categories had dramatically increased medical costs, as much as 10-fold those of patients who were in none of these categories. CONCLUSIONS: A diabetes mellitus-specific risk stratification system related to required care intensity can be used to identify patients with high medical costs and can enable care providers to select patients for case management and triage into specific care programs.
Authors: Leslie S Kinder; Wayne J Katon; Evette Ludman; Joan Russo; Greg Simon; Elizabeth H B Lin; Paul Ciechanowski; Michael Von Korff; Bessie Young Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joshua J Fenton; Michael Von Korff; Elizabeth H B Lin; Paul Ciechanowski; Bessie A Young Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Naomi C Sacks; James F Burgess; Howard J Cabral; Steven D Pizer; Marie E McDonnell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Bessie Ann Young; Elizabeth Lin; Michael Von Korff; Greg Simon; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Siobhan Everson-Stewart; Leslie Kinder; Malia Oliver; Edward J Boyko; Wayne J Katon Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jim Kaput; Richard G H Cotton; Lauren Hardman; Michael Watson; Aida I Al Aqeel; Jumana Y Al-Aama; Fahd Al-Mulla; Santos Alonso; Stefan Aretz; Arleen D Auerbach; Bharati Bapat; Inge T Bernstein; Jong Bhak; Stacey L Bleoo; Helmut Blöcker; Steven E Brenner; John Burn; Mariona Bustamante; Rita Calzone; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Michele Cargill; Paola Carrera; Lawrence Cavedon; Yoon Shin Cho; Yeun-Jun Chung; Mireille Claustres; Garry Cutting; Raymond Dalgleish; Johan T den Dunnen; Carlos Díaz; Steven Dobrowolski; M Rosário N dos Santos; Rosemary Ekong; Simon B Flanagan; Paul Flicek; Yoichi Furukawa; Maurizio Genuardi; Ho Ghang; Maria V Golubenko; Marc S Greenblatt; Ada Hamosh; John M Hancock; Ross Hardison; Terence M Harrison; Robert Hoffmann; Rania Horaitis; Heather J Howard; Carol Isaacson Barash; Neskuts Izagirre; Jongsun Jung; Toshio Kojima; Sandrine Laradi; Yeon-Su Lee; Jong-Young Lee; Vera L Gil-da-Silva-Lopes; Finlay A Macrae; Donna Maglott; Makia J Marafie; Steven G E Marsh; Yoichi Matsubara; Ludwine M Messiaen; Gabriela Möslein; Mihai G Netea; Melissa L Norton; Peter J Oefner; William S Oetting; James C O'Leary; Ana Maria Oller de Ramirez; Mark H Paalman; Jillian Parboosingh; George P Patrinos; Giuditta Perozzi; Ian R Phillips; Sue Povey; Suyash Prasad; Ming Qi; David J Quin; Rajkumar S Ramesar; C Sue Richards; Judith Savige; Dagmar G Scheible; Rodney J Scott; Daniela Seminara; Elizabeth A Shephard; Rolf H Sijmons; Timothy D Smith; María-Jesús Sobrido; Toshihiro Tanaka; Sean V Tavtigian; Graham R Taylor; Jon Teague; Thoralf Töpel; Mollie Ullman-Cullere; Joji Utsunomiya; Henk J van Kranen; Mauno Vihinen; Elizabeth Webb; Thomas K Weber; Meredith Yeager; Young I Yeom; Seon-Hee Yim; Hyang-Sook Yoo Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.878