Literature DB >> 12436830

Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques.

John G Meechan1.   

Abstract

What conclusions can be drawn concerning intraoral topical anesthesia? First, a variety of agents have been shown to have a pharmacologic effect. When used as a single agent, lidocaine is effective at concentrations between 5% and 20%. There is evidence of a dose response with lidocaine [17]. The combination of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine has been shown to be a reliable agent; however, at the time of writing, this mixture is not licensed for intraoral use. Benzocaine is effective when used alone at a concentration of 20% and when combined at a dose of 15% with 1.7% amethocaine. Second, a crucial factor governing effectiveness is the time of application. One study cited in this paper [23] has shown an effect occurring in the maxillary buccal sulcus after a 1-minute application. Others [17,25] have shown that a 2- to 3-minute application at the same site is no better than placebo. The differences in these studies may be caused by the use of different test stimuli, such as the gauge of the needle used and the depth of insertion. When applied for 5 minutes, it seems that success is guaranteed when used in the buccal fold of either jaw. Finally, the site of application is important. Palatal mucosa is more resistant to the effects of topical anesthetics than other intraoral sites investigated. There is no evidence that topical anesthetics have any value in reducing the discomfort of deep regional block administrations such as inferior alveolar nerve block injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12436830     DOI: 10.1016/s0011-8532(02)00035-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Clin North Am        ISSN: 0011-8532


  23 in total

1.  The effect of sonophoresis on topical anesthesia: a pilot project.

Authors:  Joseph L Packer; Barry Krall; Ali Makki; Mahmoud Torabinejad
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

2.  Comparative efficacy of 2 topical anesthetics for the placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices.

Authors:  Derek S Reznik; Arthur H Jeske; Jung-Wei Chen; Jeryl English
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2009

3.  Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Authors:  Rajan Gupta; Satwinder Kaur; Parveen Dahiya; Mukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-04-30

4.  Efficacy of Topical Benzocaine in Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nurain Rehman; Samir Riaz Qazi
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

5.  Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons.

Authors:  Kopal Sharma; Amit Sharma; Ml Aseri; Angelika Batta; Vikas Singh; Dinesh Pilania; Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration.

Authors:  J G Meechan; P C Howlett; B D Smith
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

7.  Pain-related behaviour in children: a randomised study during two sequential dental visits.

Authors:  E J Hembrecht; J Nieuwenhuizen; I H A Aartman; J Krikken; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-02-09

8.  Comparison of two computerised anaesthesia delivery systems: pain and pain-related behaviour in children during a dental injection.

Authors:  J Nieuwenhuizen; E J Hembrecht; I H A Aartman; J Krikken; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-02-12

9.  Effect of time on clinical efficacy of topical anesthesia.

Authors:  Jasdev Bhalla; John G Meechan; Herenia P Lawrence; Helen A Grad; Daniel A Haas
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2009

10.  Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topical 2 % lidocaine for the prevention and treatment of oral mucosal pain in children.

Authors:  Amélie E Coudert; Agnès Ostertag; Vanessa Baaroun; Catherine Artaud; Chantal Ifi-Naulin; Jean-Patick Druo; Guy Princ; Vianney Descroix
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.