Literature DB >> 12435089

The hand of birds revealed by early ostrich embryos.

Alan Feduccia1, Julie Nowicki.   

Abstract

The problem of resolving the homology of the digits of the avian hand has been framed as a conflict between paleontological and embryological evidence, the former thought to support a hand composed of digits I, II, III, because of similarity of the phalangeal formulae of the earliest known bird Archaeopteryx to that of Mesozoic pentadactyl archosaurs, while embryological evidence has traditionally favored a II, III, IV avian hand. We have identified the critical developmental period for the major features of the avian skeleton in a primitive bird, the ostrich. Analysis of digit anlagen in the avian hand has revealed those for digits/metacarpals I and V, thus confirming previous embryological studies that indirectly suggested that the avian hand comprises digits II, III, IV, and was primitively pentadactyl. The identity of the digits of the avian tridactyl hand was first addressed in 1821 and has been hotly debated since then (Meckel 1821; Holmgren 1955). Early avian embryos have three central digital condensations and a condensation for a reduced digit/metacarpal V which disappears late in development; typically a condensation for digit/metacarpal I is absent. By incubating, preparing and comparing bracketed embryos of a paleognathous bird, the ostrich, we identified the critical period for digital anlagen, providing the first direct and demonstrable evidence to support previous embryological studies that implied that the avian hand comprises digits II, III, IV (Burke and Feduccia 1997; Hinchliffe 1997). A deep split between neognathous and paleognathous birds is evidenced by Lower Cretaceous fossils of the paleognaths Ambiortus and Otogornis from Mongolia and China (Kurochkin 1999). Because paleognaths are the most likely primitive living birds, their embryology presents an opportunity to test hypotheses of skeletal homology obscured by derived modifications in other taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435089     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-002-0350-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  11 in total

Review 1.  The origin and early evolution of birds: discoveries, disputes, and perspectives from fossil evidence.

Authors:  Zhonghe Zhou
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-10

2.  Digit loss in archosaur evolution and the interplay between selection and constraints.

Authors:  Merijn A G de Bakker; Donald A Fowler; Kelly den Oude; Esther M Dondorp; M Carmen Garrido Navas; Jaroslaw O Horbanczuk; Jean-Yves Sire; Danuta Szczerbińska; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies.

Authors:  Xing Xu; James M Clark; Jinyou Mo; Jonah Choiniere; Catherine A Forster; Gregory M Erickson; David W E Hone; Corwin Sullivan; David A Eberth; Sterling Nesbitt; Qi Zhao; Rene Hernandez; Cheng-kai Jia; Feng-lu Han; Yu Guo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: an update.

Authors:  Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 5.  Tracing the evolution of avian wing digits.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Susan Mackem
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  The origins, scaling and loss of tetrapod digits.

Authors:  Aditya Saxena; Matthew Towers; Kimberly L Cooper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  New developmental evidence clarifies the evolution of wrist bones in the dinosaur-bird transition.

Authors:  João Francisco Botelho; Luis Ossa-Fuentes; Sergio Soto-Acuña; Daniel Smith-Paredes; Daniel Nuñez-León; Miguel Salinas-Saavedra; Macarena Ruiz-Flores; Alexander O Vargas
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Co-option of the cardiac transcription factor Nkx2.5 during development of the emu wing.

Authors:  Peter G Farlie; Nadia M Davidson; Naomi L Baker; Mai Raabus; Kelly N Roeszler; Claire Hirst; Andrew Major; Mylene M Mariette; David M Lambert; Alicia Oshlack; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Evolution of antero-posterior patterning of the limb: Insights from the chick.

Authors:  Matthew Towers
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  Fossils with Feathers and Philosophy of Science.

Authors:  Joyce C Havstad; N Adam Smith
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.