Literature DB >> 17046354

The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: an update.

Günter P Wagner1.   

Abstract

The identity of avian digits has been unresolved since the beginning of evolutionary morphology in the mid-19th century, i.e. as soon as questions of phylogenetic homology have been raised. The main source of concern is the persistent discrepancy between anatomical/paleontological and embryological evidence over the identity of avian digits. In this paper, recent evidence pertaining to the question of avian digit homology is reviewed and the various ideas of how to resolve the disagreement among developmental and phylogenetic evidence are evaluated. Paleontological evidence unequivocally supports the hypothesis that the fully formed digits of maniraptoran theropods are digits DI, DII, and DIII, because the phylogenetic position of Herrerasaurus is resolved, even when hand characters are excluded from the analysis. Regarding the developmental origin of the three digits of the avian hand the discovery of an anterior digit condensation in the limb bud of chickens and ostriches conclusively shows that these three digits are developing from condensations CII, CIII, and CIV. The existence of this additional anterior condensation has been confirmed in four different labs, using four different methods: Alcian blue staining, PNA affinity histochemistry, micro-capillary regression and Sox9 expression. Finally, recent evidence shows that the digit developing from condensation CII has a Hox gene expression pattern that is found in digit DI of mice forelimb and chick hind limbs. The sum of these data supports the idea that digit identity has shifted relative to the location of condensations, known as Frame Shift Hypothesis, such that condensation CII develops into digit DI and condensation CIII develops into digit DII, etc. A review of the literature on the digit identity of the Italian Three-toed Skink or Luscengola (Chalcides chalcides), shows that digit identity frame shifts may not be limited to the bird hand but may be characteristic of "adaptive" digit reduction in amniotes (sensu Steiner, H., Anders, G., 1946. Zur Frage der Entstehung von Rudimenten. Die Reduktion der Gliedmassen von Chalcides tridactylus Laur. Rev. Suisse Zool. 53, 537-546) in general. In this mode of evolution two digits are lost, in the course of the adaptation of the three anterior digits to a function that does not require the two posterior digits. This evidence suggests that the evolution of digits in tetrapods can proceed at least on two distinct levels of integration, the level of digit condensations and that of adult digits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17046354     DOI: 10.1007/bf02814482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theory Biosci        ISSN: 1431-7613            Impact factor:   1.919


  28 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of dinosaurs.

Authors:  P C Sereno
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Phenogenetic drift and the evolution of genotype-phenotype relationships.

Authors:  K M Weiss; S M Fullerton
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  1,2,3 = 2,3,4: accommodating the cladogram.

Authors:  A Feduccia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Learning from history: morphology's challenges in Germany ca. 1900.

Authors:  Lynn K Nyhart
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  The hand of birds revealed by early ostrich embryos.

Authors:  Alan Feduccia; Julie Nowicki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2002-08-14

6.  Pentadactyl ground state of the avian wing.

Authors:  Hans C E Larsson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2002-08-15

Review 7.  Divide, accumulate, differentiate: cell condensation in skeletal development revisited.

Authors:  B K Hall; T Miyake
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.203

8.  Vascularization of developing anterior lamb of the chick embryo. II. Differentiation of vascular bed and its significance for the location of morphogenetic processes inside the limb bud.

Authors:  V Seichert; Z Rychter
Journal:  Folia Morphol (Praha)       Date:  1972

Review 9.  Triphalangeal thumb.

Authors:  Q Qazi; E G Kassner
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity.

Authors:  Ying Litingtung; Randall D Dahn; Yina Li; John F Fallon; Chin Chiang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Transcriptomic analysis of avian digits reveals conserved and derived digit identities in birds.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Rebecca L Young; Huiling Xue; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The missing segment of the autopod 1st ray: new insights from a morphometric study of the human hand.

Authors:  Ugo E Pazzaglia; Valeria Sibilia; Lavinia Casati; Andrea G Salvi; Andrea Minini; Marcella Reguzzoni
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Trish E Parsons; Julia C Boughner; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 4.  Tracing the evolution of avian wing digits.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Susan Mackem
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Homologies and homeotic transformation of the theropod 'semilunate' carpal.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Fenglu Han; Qi Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The evolution of HoxD-11 expression in the bird wing: insights from Alligator mississippiensis.

Authors:  Alexander O Vargas; Tiana Kohlsdorf; John F Fallon; John Vandenbrooks; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.