OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dissemination of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Smoking cessation clinical practice guideline in community health centres. DESIGN: Pre- and post-trial. SETTING: Fourteen community health centres in Rhode Island. SUBJECTS: Provider performance was assessed with 1798 and 1591 patient contacts, in pre-post cross sectional consecutive samples, respectively, and 891 contacts at one year follow up. INTERVENTIONS: Three, one hour on-site provider training sessions, on review of effective tobacco interventions, use of office systems, and tobacco counselling skill building. OUTCOME MEASURES: Chart documentation of four A's (Ask, Advise, Assist, and Arrange follow up) at most recent primary care visit. RESULTS: While average performance rates increased for Ask and Advise (from 30% to 44%, and 19% to 26%, pre-post, respectively), significant increases were found only for some visit types, with further differences by patient sex. There were significant increases for Ask for all except obstetric/gynaecological (ob/gyn) visit types. Patients at yearly physicals and first visits were more likely to be asked at all time points, while males were more likely to be asked at acute visits than were females. There were no significant increases for Advise, Assist, and Arrange across time, although female patients showed a differential increase in Advise post-training. Advise was significantly more likely in yearly physicals and first visits, and less likely in ob/gyn visits, at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline dissemination effort resulted in quite different provider counselling rates across patient sexes, and visit types. Guideline implementation may require more sustained efforts, with multiple strategies, which are reinforced at higher policy levels, to more fully integrate tobacco interventions into routine primary care practice with all patients who smoke.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dissemination of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Smoking cessation clinical practice guideline in community health centres. DESIGN: Pre- and post-trial. SETTING: Fourteen community health centres in Rhode Island. SUBJECTS: Provider performance was assessed with 1798 and 1591 patient contacts, in pre-post cross sectional consecutive samples, respectively, and 891 contacts at one year follow up. INTERVENTIONS: Three, one hour on-site provider training sessions, on review of effective tobacco interventions, use of office systems, and tobacco counselling skill building. OUTCOME MEASURES: Chart documentation of four A's (Ask, Advise, Assist, and Arrange follow up) at most recent primary care visit. RESULTS: While average performance rates increased for Ask and Advise (from 30% to 44%, and 19% to 26%, pre-post, respectively), significant increases were found only for some visit types, with further differences by patient sex. There were significant increases for Ask for all except obstetric/gynaecological (ob/gyn) visit types. Patients at yearly physicals and first visits were more likely to be asked at all time points, while males were more likely to be asked at acute visits than were females. There were no significant increases for Advise, Assist, and Arrange across time, although female patients showed a differential increase in Advise post-training. Advise was significantly more likely in yearly physicals and first visits, and less likely in ob/gyn visits, at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline dissemination effort resulted in quite different provider counselling rates across patient sexes, and visit types. Guideline implementation may require more sustained efforts, with multiple strategies, which are reinforced at higher policy levels, to more fully integrate tobacco interventions into routine primary care practice with all patients who smoke.
Authors: L I Solberg; M L Brekke; C J Fazio; J Fowles; D N Jacobsen; T E Kottke; G Mosser; P J O'Connor; K A Ohnsorg; S J Rolnick Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Improv Date: 2000-04
Authors: D P Hopkins; P A Briss; C J Ricard; C G Husten; V G Carande-Kulis; J E Fielding; M O Alao; J W McKenna; D J Sharp; J R Harris; T A Woollery; K W Harris Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David O Warner; Annie LeBlanc; Sandeep Kadimpati; Kristin S Vickers; Yu Shi; Victor M Montori Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Steven J Ondersma; Dace S Svikis; Phebe K Lam; Veronica S Connors-Burge; David M Ledgerwood; John A Hopper Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kristie L Foley; Jessica R Pockey; Donald W Helme; Eun-Young Song; Kate Stewart; Cindy Jones; John G Spangler; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2012-03-30
Authors: Catherine A Powers; Jane Zapka; Sharon Phelan; Tulin Özcan; Katie Brooks Biello; Joseph O'Donnell; Alan Geller Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2011-11
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein; Melissa M Farmer; Bruce A Chernof; Brian S Mittman; Andrew B Lanto; Barbara F Simon; Martin L Lee; Scott E Sherman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah A Pollick; Jessica R Beatty; Robert J Sokol; Ronald C Strickler; Grace Chang; Dace S Svikis; Golfo K Tzilos; Steven J Ondersma Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.716