Literature DB >> 10749003

Lessons from experienced guideline implementers: attend to many factors and use multiple strategies.

L I Solberg1, M L Brekke, C J Fazio, J Fowles, D N Jacobsen, T E Kottke, G Mosser, P J O'Connor, K A Ohnsorg, S J Rolnick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of clinical guideline implementation have focused almost entirely on changing individual clinician behavior with single intervention strategies and without much attention to the situational context. The goal of this project was to learn from clinic leaders, seasoned in the guideline implementation process, what contextual variables they viewed as important and whether implementation success could be expected if only a single implementation strategy was used.
METHODS: In 1998, 12 people with extensive experience in leading clinical guideline implementation were identified who were thought to have particularly keen insight into the process. They were interviewed to generate variables they considered important, as well as strategies they considered effective when used appropriately. A modified nominal group/Delphi process was then used for rating these variables and strategies, and the reactions of international experts were obtained to add perspective to this information.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven variables and 25 strategies were identified, clustering in 6 categories (ranked in order of importance by the panel): organizational capabilities for change, infrastructure for implementation, implementation strategies, medical group characteristics, guideline characteristics, and external environment. All six categories were considered to be important, key, or essential by the experienced implementers, although variables within a medical group that directly affect its ability to undertake planned change were rated as much more important than either guideline characteristics or the external environment. DISCUSSION: Although the opinions of those experienced in the process of guideline implementation are primarily of value for generating hypotheses, panel members believe that implementation efforts focusing on the individual physician with a single strategy are unlikely to be successful. Rather, implementation efforts must use multiple strategies that take account of multiple characteristics of the guideline, practice organization, and external environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10749003     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26013-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  65 in total

1.  Two kinds of knowledge to achieve better care.

Authors:  L A Headrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Comprehensive categorization of guideline recommendations: creating an action palette for implementers.

Authors:  Abdelwaheb Essaihi; George Michel; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): insights from a team-based change management strategy in primary care.

Authors:  Bijal A Balasubramanian; Sabrina M Chase; Paul A Nutting; Deborah J Cohen; Pamela A Ohman Strickland; Jesse C Crosson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Stephen F Rothemich; Robert E Johnson; J Eric Peele; Tina D Cunningham; Daniel R Longo; Ghalib A Bello; Gary R Matzke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Using a modified nominal group technique to elicit director of nursing input for an osteoporosis intervention.

Authors:  Deborah A Levine; Kenneth G Saag; Linda L Casebeer; Cathleen Colon-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles; Richard M Shewchuk
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Organizational systems to support publicly funded tobacco treatment services.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Mary Jo White; George Reed; Judith K Ockene; Elena List; Lori Pbert; Denise Jolicoeur; Sarah Reiff-Hekking
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Changing organizational constructs into functional tools: an assessment of the 5 A's in primary care practices.

Authors:  Steven A Dosh; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Trissa Torres; Anita K Arnold; Jeanne Baumann; Linda L White
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Putting it together: finding success in behavior change through integration of services.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Russell E Glasgow; Alex Krist; Claudia Bartz; Susan A Flocke; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Stephen F Rothemich; Ellen R Wald
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pearson; Shinyi Wu; Judith Schaefer; Amy E Bonomi; Stephen M Shortell; Peter J Mendel; Jill A Marsteller; Thomas A Louis; Mayde Rosen; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care.

Authors:  Robert L Ferrer; Priti Mody-Bailey; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Sherrie Gott; Sara Araujo
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.