Literature DB >> 12432012

'Fixed-axis' magnetic orientation by an amphibian: non-shoreward-directed compass orientation, misdirected homing or positioning a magnetite-based map detector in a consistent alignment relative to the magnetic field?

John B Phillips1, S Chris Borland, Michael J Freake, Jacques Brassart, Joseph L Kirschvink.   

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to investigate the earlier prediction that prolonged exposure to long-wavelength (>500 nm) light would eliminate homing orientation by male Eastern red-spotted newts Notophthalmus viridescens. As in previous experiments, controls held in outdoor tanks under natural lighting conditions and tested in a visually uniform indoor arena under full-spectrum light were homeward oriented. As predicted, however, newts held under long-wavelength light and tested under either full-spectrum or long-wavelength light (>500 nm) failed to show consistent homeward orientation. The newts also did not orient with respect to the shore directions in the outdoor tanks in which they were held prior to testing. Unexpectedly, however, the newts exhibited bimodal orientation along a more-or-less 'fixed' north-northeast-south-southwest magnetic axis. The orientation exhibited by newts tested under full-spectrum light was indistinguishable from that of newts tested under long-wavelength light, although these two wavelength conditions have previously been shown to differentially affect both shoreward compass orientation and homing orientation. To investigate the possibility that the 'fixed-axis' response of the newts was mediated by a magnetoreception mechanism involving single-domain particles of magnetite, natural remanent magnetism (NRM) was measured from a subset of the newts. The distribution of NRM alignments with respect to the head-body axis of the newts was indistinguishable from random. Furthermore, there was no consistent relationship between the NRM of individual newts and their directional response in the overall sample. However, under full-spectrum, but not long-wavelength, light, the alignment of the NRM when the newts reached the 20 cm radius criterion circle in the indoor testing arena (estimated by adding the NRM alignment measured from each newt to its magnetic bearing) was non-randomly distributed. These findings are consistent with the earlier suggestion that homing newts use the light-dependent magnetic compass to align a magnetite-based 'map detector' when obtaining the precise measurements necessary to derive map information from the magnetic field. However, aligning the putative map detector does not explain the fixed-axis response of newts tested under long-wavelength light. Preliminary evidence suggests that, in the absence of reliable directional information from the magnetic compass (caused by the 90 degrees rotation of the response of the magnetic compass under long-wavelength light), newts may resort to a systematic sampling strategy to identify alignment(s) of the map detector that yields reliable magnetic field measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12432012     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.24.3903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Magnetic orientation in birds: non-compass responses under monochromatic light of increased intensity.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Ursula Munro; Hugh Ford; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jeremy Shaw; Alastair Boyd; Michael House; Robert Woodward; Falko Mathes; Gary Cowin; Martin Saunders; Boris Baer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Magnetoreception in birds: different physical processes for two types of directional responses.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-03-21

Review 5.  Directional orientation of birds by the magnetic field under different light conditions.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Photoreceptor-based magnetoreception: optimal design of receptor molecules, cells, and neuronal processing.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Margaret Ahmad; Henrik Mouritsen; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Directional preference may enhance hunting accuracy in foraging foxes.

Authors:  Jaroslav Červený; Sabine Begall; Petr Koubek; Petra Nováková; Hynek Burda
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Spontaneous magnetic alignment behaviour in free-living lizards.

Authors:  Francisco J Diego-Rasilla; Valentín Pérez-Mellado; Ana Pérez-Cembranos
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 9.  Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Authors:  John Phillips; Rachel Muheim; Michael Painter; Jenny Raines; Chris Anderson; Lukas Landler; Dave Dommer; Adam Raines; Mark Deutschlander; John Whitehead; Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; Paul Youmans; Chris Borland; Kelly Sloan; Kaitlyn McKenna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Magnetic alignment in carps: evidence from the Czech christmas fish market.

Authors:  Vlastimil Hart; Tomáš Kušta; Pavel Němec; Veronika Bláhová; Miloš Ježek; Petra Nováková; Sabine Begall; Jaroslav Cervený; Vladimír Hanzal; Erich Pascal Malkemper; Kamil Stípek; Christiane Vole; Hynek Burda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.