Literature DB >> 12431263

Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review.

Jo Garcia1, Leanne Bricker, Jane Henderson, Marie-Anne Martin, Miranda Mugford, Jim Nielson, Tracy Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound has become a routine part of care for pregnant women in most countries with developed health services. It is one of a range of techniques used in screening and diagnosis, but it differs from most others because of the direct access that it gives parents to images of the fetus. A review of women's views of ultrasound was commissioned as part of a larger study of the clinical and economic aspects of routine antenatal ultrasound use.
METHODS: Studies of women's views about antenatal screening and diagnosis were searched for on electronic databases. Studies about pregnancy ultrasound were then identified from this material. Further studies were found by contacting researchers, hand searches, and following up references. The searches were not intentionally limited by date or language. Studies that reported direct data from women about pregnancy ultrasound were then included in a structured review. Studies were not excluded on the basis of methodological quality unless they were impossible to understand. They were read by one author and tabulated. The review then addressed a series of questions in a nonquantitative way.
RESULTS: The structured review included 74 primary studies represented by 98 reports. Studies from 18 countries were included, and they employed methods ranging from qualitative interviewing to psychometric testing. The review included studies from the very early period of ultrasound use up to reports of research on contemporary practice. Ultrasound is very attractive to women and families. Women's early concerns about the safety of ultrasound were rarely reported in more recent research. Women often lack information about the purposes for which an ultrasound scan is being done and the technical limitations of the procedure. The strong appeal of diagnostic ultrasound use may contribute to the fact that pregnant women are often unprepared for adverse findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the highly varied study designs and contexts for the research included, this review provided useful information about women's views of pregnancy ultrasound. One key finding for clinicians was the need for all staff, women, and partners to be well informed about the specific purposes of ultrasound scans and what they can and cannot achieve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431263     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  55 in total

1.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

2.  Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Nicholas Mays; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

3.  Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Peter Lindgren; Karin Nordin; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?

Authors:  Caroline Silcock; Lih-Mei Liao; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Referral for fetal echocardiography is associated with increased maternal anxiety.

Authors:  Katherine B Rosenberg; Catherine Monk; Julie S Glickstein; Stephanie M Levasseur; Lynn L Simpson; Charles S Kleinman; Ismee A Williams
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 6.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 7.  Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature.

Authors:  Maggie Lawrence; Sue Kinn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Fiona A Lynn; Grainne E Crealey; Fiona A Alderdice; James C McElnay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of expectant women toward routine sonography in pregnancy at Naguru health centre, Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Businge Francis; Byanyima Rosemary
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2009-11-30

10.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.