Literature DB >> 12430898

Treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Walter Ageno1.   

Abstract

The combination of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants is currently the treatment of choice for most patients with venous thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulants are started at the same time and heparin is discontinued after at least 5 days when the levels of the International Normalized Ratio reach the therapeutic range between 2.0 and 3.0. Low molecular weight heparin has potential advantages over heparin and is administered in subcutaneous weight-adjusted fixed doses without need for monitoring. This has made the home treatment of a large proportion of patients possible. Randomized clinical trials and several subsequent reports from clinical practice have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this approach. The results of currently ongoing trials aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of newer compounds for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism are expected. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or selective factor-Xa inhibitors have the potential to become the treatment of choice in the next decade. The optimal duration of the secondary prophylaxis with oral anticoagulants is still a matter of debate. The rate of recurrence has been shown to be elevated, particularly in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. A 3-month therapy is therefore currently recommended when a transient risk factor is identified, life-long treatment is recommended for patients with a second episode of venous thromboembolism. The presence of active cancer or a thrombophilic state may require long-term anticoagulation, although not all the congenital hypercoagulable states seem to carry the same level of risk. In all other cases, 6 months are recommended, but a long-term monitoring of the patients is advisable. The use of more aggressive strategies such as thrombolysis is limited to patients presenting with massive pulmonary embolism or signs of right ventricular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430898     DOI: 10.1007/bf03165084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  21 in total

1.  Risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence: high negative predictive value of D-dimer performed after oral anticoagulation is stopped.

Authors:  Gualtiero Palareti; Cristina Legnani; Benilde Cosmi; Giuliana Guazzaloca; Claudia Pancani; Sergio Coccheri
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group.

Authors:  S Schulman; A S Rhedin; P Lindmarker; A Carlsson; G Lärfars; P Nicol; E Loogna; E Svensson; B Ljungberg; H Walter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection.

Authors:  P S Wells; M J Kovacs; J Bormanis; M A Forgie; D Goudie; B Morrow; J Kovacs
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

4.  Selecting patients for home treatment of deep vein thrombosis: the problem of cancer.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Luigi Steidl; Chiara Marchesi; Francesco Dentali; Valentina Mera; Alessandro Squizzato; Mark A Crowther; Achille Venco
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Normalization rates of compression ultrasonography in patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: association with recurrence and new thrombosis.

Authors:  Franco Piovella; Luciano Crippa; Marisa Barone; Silvana Viganò D'Angelo; Silvia Serafini; Laura Galli; Chiara Beltrametti; Armando D'Angelo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Leizorovicz; G Simonneau; H Decousus; J P Boissel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-30

7.  Low-molecular-weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Siragusa; B Cosmi; F Piovella; J Hirsh; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  M Levine; M Gent; J Hirsh; J Leclerc; D Anderson; J Weitz; J Ginsberg; A G Turpie; C Demers; M Kovacs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group.

Authors:  M M Koopman; P Prandoni; F Piovella; P A Ockelford; D P Brandjes; J van der Meer; A S Gallus; G Simonneau; C H Chesterman; M H Prins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Heparin binding to plasma proteins, an important mechanism for heparin resistance.

Authors:  E Young; M Prins; M N Levine; J Hirsh
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.