Literature DB >> 12010666

Normalization rates of compression ultrasonography in patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: association with recurrence and new thrombosis.

Franco Piovella1, Luciano Crippa, Marisa Barone, Silvana Viganò D'Angelo, Silvia Serafini, Laura Galli, Chiara Beltrametti, Armando D'Angelo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delayed thrombus regression after a first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the inferior limbs has been implicated in the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Whether normalization of vein segments involved in the index DVT has prognostic significance with respect to the probability of DVT recurrence or new thrombosis is currently unknown. In this study, we prospectively monitored thrombus regression in consecutive patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT. Factors affecting normalization rates and the relationship between previous normalization and DVT recurrence or new thrombosis were explored. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-nine patients with a first episode of symptomatic DVT of the lower limbs (38 with cancer) and 104 patients with DVT occurring after hip replacement surgery were serially monitored by real time B-mode compression ultrasonography (C-US) over a period of 12 months (months 1, 3, 6 and 12). C-US normalization of popliteal and femoral venous segments was arbitrarily assigned to be residual thrombus occupying, at maximum compressibility, less than 40% of the vein area in the absence of compression.
RESULTS: In patients with no DVT recurrence or new thrombosis, C-US normalization was observed at 12 months in 100% of 99 patients with post-operative DVT, in 59% of 134 cancer-free symptomatic DVT outpatients and in 23.3% of 30 symptomatic DVT outpatients with cancer (p = 0.0001). Independent negative effects on the probability of C-US normalization were observed for younger age (p <0.05), for the outpatient presentation of the index DVT (p 0.017), for DVT involving the entire femoro-popliteal axis (p 0.05), and for the presence of cancer (p 0.05). DVT recurrence or new thrombosis was observed in 5 patients with post-operative DVT (4.8%), in 7 cancer-free patients with symptomatic DVT (5.0%) and in 8 patients with cancer (21.1%). Only 4 of these patients had shown normalization of their index DVT prior to the event. The presence of cancer was the only significant predictor of DVT recurrence and/or new thrombosis occurring within 3 months from the index DVT (OR = 4.90, p = 0.002). The absence of previous C-US normalization was the only predictor of recurrence or new thrombosis occurring after 3 and 6 months from the index DVT (OR 5.26, p 0.027). INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Absence of C-US normalization after a first episode of DVT appears to be a factor favoring recurrence or new thrombosis and may be relevant to the optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12010666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  31 in total

1.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  The postthrombotic syndrome.

Authors:  Raffaele Pesavento; Sabina Villalta; Paolo Prandoni
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Acute deep vein thrombosis cases in the real world.

Authors:  Seth J Klein; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Walter Ageno
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities.

Authors:  Farbod Nicholas Rahaghi; Jasleen Kaur Minhas; Gustavo A Heresi
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 7.  Incidence and interventions for post-thrombotic syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Farrell; Christopher Sutter; Sidhartha Tavri; Indravadan Patel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Extended anticoagulation for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a majority of patients should be treated.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Pancreatic cancer and thromboembolic disease, 150 years after Trousseau.

Authors:  David Ansari; Daniel Ansari; Roland Andersson; Åke Andrén-Sandberg
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.293

10.  Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Marc A Rodger; Susan R Kahn; Philip S Wells; David A Anderson; Isabelle Chagnon; Grégoire Le Gal; Susan Solymoss; Mark Crowther; Arnaud Perrier; Richard White; Linda Vickars; Tim Ramsay; Marisol T Betancourt; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.