Literature DB >> 12430823

A broadband tactile array on the fingertip.

Ian R Summers1, Craig M Chanter.   

Abstract

A stimulator array is described which can deliver a wide range of displacement waveforms from each contactor, allowing vibratory stimuli to be targeted towards different populations of mechanoreceptors in the skin. The array has a working bandwidth of 20-400 Hz and 100 moving contactors covering an area of 1 cm2 on the fingertip. The array was validated with two experiments on the perception of moving vibratory targets within a uniform background vibration. In the first experiment, with target and background at the same frequency, equivalent discrimination of target movement was obtained at higher values of target/background amplitude ratio for 40-Hz stimuli than for 320-Hz stimuli. In the second experiment, discrimination of target movement within a different-frequency background (320-Hz target and 40-Hz background, or vice versa) was found to be much easier than within a same-frequency background. These results suggest that tactile spatial acuity is better at 320 Hz than 40 Hz and that it is possible to target different receptor populations in the skin by using these frequencies. However, there are problems with this interpretation: on the basis of characterization of touch receptors in previous studies, spatial acuity is expected to be worse at 320 Hz than at 40 Hz.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430823     DOI: 10.1121/1.1510140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin's achievable throughput.

Authors:  Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of tactile feedback in grip force during laparoscopic training tasks.

Authors:  Christopher R Wottawa; Jeremiah R Cohen; Richard E Fan; James W Bisley; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  V Tannan; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  A simulation environment for studying transcutaneous electrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Gloria Araiza Illan; Heiko Stüber; Ken E Friedl; Ian R Summers; Angelika Peer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Wearable Assistive Device for Blind Pedestrians Using Real-Time Object Detection and Tactile Presentation.

Authors:  Junjie Shen; Yiwen Chen; Hideyuki Sawada
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Haptic stylus and empirical studies on braille, button, and texture display.

Authors:  Ki-Uk Kyung; Jun-Young Lee; Junseok Park
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008

8.  A quantitative method for determining spatial discriminative capacity.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Vinay Tannan; Jameson K Holden; Robert G Dennis; Mark Tommerdahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Effects of stimulus-driven synchronization on sensory perception.

Authors:  Mark Tommerdahl; Vinay Tannan; Matt Zachek; Jameson K Holden; Oleg V Favorov
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  A Novel Untethered Hand Wearable with Fine-Grained Cutaneous Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Alexander Co Abad; David Reid; Anuradha Ranasinghe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.