Literature DB >> 12430687

Prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in beef cattle from transport to slaughter.

John C Beach1, Elsa A Murano, Gary R Acuff.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of typical production practices during the transport of cattle on the resulting incidence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in the feces, on the hides, and on the carcasses of these cattle and in the environment (trucks, holding pens, and knock boxes). Various factors were evaluated, including the type of animal (feedlot cattle vs. adult pasture cattle), the breed of cattle, the body condition of the animal, the age of the animal, the time of feed and water withdrawal, the contamination level of the transport vehicle at the feedlot or farm, the transport time, the time cattle were held in the holding pen at the plant, and the contamination level of the holding pen. Four groups of each type of animal were sampled on different days. Samples were collected from cattle prior to transport and after transport (rectal and hide swabs) as well as from the carcasses of these cattle. Pre- and posttransit samples were also taken from the transport vehicle and from the holding pen and knock box at the slaughter facility. For feedlot cattle, fecal shedding stayed fairly constant for both organisms before and after transport (3 to 5% for Salmonella and 64 to 68% for Campylobacter). However, the shedding rate for adult cattle increased from 1 to 21% for Salmonella but stayed constant for Campylobacter (6 to 7%). Contamination of hides with Salmonella increased for both animal types from a level of 18 to 20% to a level 50 to 56%. For Campylobacter, the contamination level decreased from 25 to 13% for feedlot cattle but remained unchanged for adult animals (1 to 2%). Nineteen percent of feedlot cattle carcasses and 54% of adult cattle carcasses tested positive for Salmonella, while only2% of feedlot cattle carcasses and none of the adult cattle carcasses tested positive for Campylobacter. Thus, for feedlot cattle, the factors considered in this study did not affect the shedding of either organism but did affect the contamination of hides with both. For adult animals, the factors increased both shedding of and hide contamination with Salmonella only, not Campylobacter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430687     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.11.1687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  13 in total

1.  Effect of ractopamine HCl supplementation on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  T S Edrington; T R Callaway; S E Ives; M J Engler; T H Welsh; D M Hallford; K J Genovese; R C Anderson; D J Nisbet
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Subtype-Specific Selection for Resistance to Fluoroquinolones but Not to Tetracyclines Is Evident in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Beef Cattle in Confined Feeding Operations in Southern Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; L Brent Selinger; Eduardo N Taboada; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes on cattle hides.

Authors:  Sangeetha Ananda Baskaran; Abhinav Upadhyay; Indu Upadhyaya; Varunkumar Bhattaram; Kumar Venkitanarayanan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of postweaning supplementation of immunomodulatory feed ingredient on circulating cytokines and microbial populations in programmed fed beef heifers.

Authors:  Keelee J McCarty; Jessie E Tipton; Ralph E Ricks; Jessica Danielo; Jesse S Thompson; Elliot Block; Scott L Pratt; Nathan M Long
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves.

Authors:  John B Kaneene; Lorin D Warnick; Carole A Bolin; Ronald J Erskine; Katherine May; Roseann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in cattle in Finland and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains.

Authors:  Marjaana Hakkinen; Helmi Heiska; Marja-Liisa Hänninen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Occurrences of thermophilic Campylobacter in cattle slaughtered at Morogoro municipal abattoir, Tanzania.

Authors:  Hezron E Nonga; P Sells; E D Karimuribo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Potential associations between fecal shedding of Salmonella in feedlot cattle treated for apparent respiratory disease and subsequent adverse health outcomes.

Authors:  Mohammad Jahangir Alam; David G Renter; Samuel E Ives; Daniel U Thomson; Michael W Sanderson; Larry C Hollis; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 10.  Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs.

Authors:  Sharon V R Epps; Roger B Harvey; Michael E Hume; Timothy D Phillips; Robin C Anderson; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.