Literature DB >> 12430532

"It just goes against the grain." Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK.

Alison Shaw1.   

Abstract

This paper reports on one aspect of qualitative research on public understandings of food risks, focusing on lay understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK context. A range of theoretical, conceptual, and empirical literature on food, risk, and the public understanding of science are reviewed. The fieldwork methods are outlined and empirical data from a range of lay groups are presented. Major themes include: varying "technical" knowledge of science, the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of genetic modification, the uncertainty of scientific knowledge, genetic modification as inappropriate scientific intervention in "nature", the acceptability of animal and human applications of genetic modification, the appropriate boundaries of scientific innovation, the necessity for GM foods, the uncertainty of risks in GM food, fatalism about avoiding risks, and trust in "experts" to manage potential risks in GM food. Key discussion points relating to a sociological understanding of public attitudes to GM food are raised and some policy implications are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430532     DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  7 in total

1.  The risks of eating and drinking.

Authors:  Susan B T Wilkinson; Gene Rowe; Nigel Lambert
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Examining the Gap between Science and Public Opinion about Genetically Modified Food and Global Warming.

Authors:  Brandon R McFadden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.

Authors:  Stefan P L de Jong; Elena Ketting; Leonie van Drooge
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-10-08

4.  Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of "naturalness".

Authors:  Kia Ditlevsen; Cecilie Glerup; Peter Sandøe; Jesper Lassen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  N de Graeff; Karin R Jongsma; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras.

Authors:  Alison Harvey; Brian Salter
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2012-02-21

7.  Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineering.

Authors:  Rob Bellamy; Jason Chilvers; Naomi E Vaughan
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2014-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.