Literature DB >> 12429369

Short-term semantic retention during on-line sentence comprehension. Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions.

Henk J Haarmann1, Katherine A Cameron, Daniel S Ruchkin.   

Abstract

In filler-gap sentences, a phrase ('filler') is separated by intervening words from a subsequent phrase ('gap') with which it is integrated. The filler-gap interval provides a useful model for the study of short-term retention processes during sentence comprehension. Kluender and Kutas [J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 29] used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to show that a filler phrase places a demand on short-term retention processes in the filler-gap interval, but left the processing level at which this demand arises unspecified. Here we use ERPs to address the issue of whether the filler places a demand on the semantic component of short-term retention processes in the filler-gap interval. Participants read filler-gap sentences, which began with a filler phrase and, in the filler-gap interval, contained a subject and object that were either semantically related or unrelated. There was also a control condition in which the filler phrase was absent (i.e. less memory demand). The main result was that during the filler-gap interval, bilateral posterior electrodes displayed a larger positivity for unrelated than related words. Moreover, during the same interval, posterior electrodes displayed a larger positivity for filler-gap sentences than for control sentences. In the control condition (non-filler gap sentences), manipulation of semantic relatedness did not produce differences in ERP activity. Our results suggest that a filler phrase places a demand on the semantic component of verbal working memory during on-line sentence comprehension. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12429369     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00168-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  3 in total

1.  Searching for the trace: the influence of age, lexical activation and working memory on sentence processing.

Authors:  Anthony J Angwin; Helen J Chenery; David A Copland; Elizabeth A Cardell; Bruce E Murdoch; John C L Ingram
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-01

2.  Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.

Authors:  Todd R Ferretti; Marta Kutas; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Normative data for idiomatic expressions.

Authors:  Emily Nordmann; Antonia A Jambazova
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.