Literature DB >> 12429248

Correctable visual impairment in an older population: the blue mountains eye study.

Suriya Foran1, Kathryn Rose, Jie Jin Wang, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe temporal changes in the characteristics of older persons with visual impairment in their better eye correctable by refraction.
DESIGN: Study of two cross sections of a community 6 years apart.
METHODS: The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 persons aged 49 to 97 during 1992 to 1994 (cross-section 1) and 3509 persons (2335 cohort survivors plus 1174 persons who moved to the area and age group) during 1997 to 2000 (cross-section 2). Logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity was measured before and after refraction. Correctable visual impairment was defined as visual impairment < 20/40 in the better eye before refraction that improved after refraction to no impairment (>/= 20/40). Factors associated with correctable visual impairment and persistent correctable impairment were determined.
RESULTS: Cross-sections 1 and 2 had similar age-gender distributions. In cross-section 1, 7.5% of participants had correctable visual impairment, 3.6% had noncorrectable visual impairment, and 88.9% had no impairment. Corresponding rates in cross-section 2 were 5.6%, 2.7%, and 91.7%. In both cross sections, similar proportions (around 68%) of those visually impaired had correctable visual impairment and similar sociodemographic measures predicted correctable visual impairment. Cross-section 1 participants who were married, owned their home, had high job prestige, gained qualifications after high school, or were current drivers were less likely to have correctable visual impairment after controlling for age and gender. Adjusted odds for correctable visual impairment increased in those living alone, using community support services, dependent on others, with myopia, wearing distance glasses, or with low perceived health and heart disease. Histories of stroke, cancer, and diabetes were similar between groups with correctable and no visual impairment.
CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic parameters, myopia, wearing distance glasses, reported health problems, and poor perceived health were associated with correctable visual impairment in this older population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12429248     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01673-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  20 in total

1.  Seven-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error among an elderly Chinese population in Shihpai, Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study.

Authors:  T-M Kuang; S-Y Tsai; C J-L Liu; Y-C Ko; S-M Lee; P Chou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Frequency of under-corrected refractive errors in elderly Chinese in Beijing.

Authors:  Liang Xu; Jianjun Li; Tongtong Cui; Zhongbiao Tong; Guizhi Fan; Hua Yang; Baochen Sun; Yuanyuan Zheng; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Heritability and shared environment estimates for myopia and associated ocular biometric traits: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) family study.

Authors:  Christine Yi-Chin Chen; Katrina Jacqueline Scurrah; Jim Stankovich; Pam Garoufalis; Mohamed Dirani; Kelly Kathleen Pertile; Andrea Jane Richardson; Paul Mitchell; Paul Nigel Baird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Prevalence and risk factors of food insecurity among a cohort of older Australians.

Authors:  J Russell; V Flood; H Yeatman; P Mitchell
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Visual Impairment in White, Chinese, Black, and Hispanic Participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Authors:  Diana E Fisher; Sandi Shrager; Steven J Shea; Gregory L Burke; Ronald Klein; Tien Y Wong; Barbara E Klein; Mary Frances Cotch
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.648

6.  Prevalence and Associated Factors of Uncorrected Refractive Error in Older Adults in a Population-Based Study in France.

Authors:  Virginie Naël; Gwendoline Moreau; Solène Monfermé; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Angelo Arleo; Jean-François Korobelnik; Cécile Delcourt; Catherine Helmer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Association of Visual Acuity Improvement With Uncorrected Refractive Error in Patients New to Low Vision Clinics.

Authors:  Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Judith E Goldstein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Uncorrected refractive error in Singapore teenagers.

Authors:  C-S D Ho; C-B C Ng; E Chan; A Ngeow; R Wijaya; V Ashok; W Tang; G Gazzard; W-H Chua; S-M Saw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Causes of visual impairment in people aged 75 years and older in Britain: an add-on study to the MRC Trial of Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community.

Authors:  J R Evans; A E Fletcher; R P L Wormald
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Prevalence and predictors of refractive error and spectacle coverage in Nakuru, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Authors:  Andrew Bastawrous; Wanjiku Mathenge; Allen Foster; Hannah Kuper
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.