Literature DB >> 12421103

Options for early therapeutic abortion: a comparative review.

Marc Bygdeman1, Kristina G Danielsson.   

Abstract

Vacuum aspiration, either manual or electric, has for many years been the most commonly used method for termination of an early pregnancy. More recently, new medical methods have been developed which for many women are attractive alternatives to the surgical procedure. The compounds mainly used are prostaglandin analogues, methotrexate, and mifepristone in combination with a suitable prostaglandin analogue. However, only the last method has been registered for routine clinical use. The treatment schedule mainly used is mifepristone 200 to 600 mg followed 36 to 48 hours later by oral misoprostol 0.4 to 0.6 mg in pregnancies up to 49 days and vaginal gemeprost 1.0mg or misoprostol 0.8 mg if the treatment period is extended to 63 days of amenorrhoea. The ability to compare medical and surgical methods is limited by the fact that there are few randomised studies and the definitions of successful outcome (complete abortion), adverse effects and complications vary from one study to the other. Experience with the method used is also important for the outcome. However, it seems adequate to state that the medical method is equally, or almost equally, as effective as vacuum aspiration. Duration of bleeding and amount of blood loss is greater following medical abortion. Also the frequency of uterine pain, vomiting and diarrhoea is higher following medical abortion than following vacuum aspiration. On the other hand, the frequency of major complications such as excessive bleeding, blood transfusion and pelvic infection does not seem to differ between the two procedures. Surgical complications, for example, uterine perforation and cervical tears, are obviously not a risk associated with medical abortion. Both methods are equally well accepted provided the woman is allowed to choose. It is not possible to state which method is best. Medical termination of early pregnancy will not replace, but is an alternative to, vacuum aspiration and ideally both methods should be available to give the woman a choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12421103     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200262170-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  47 in total

Review 1.  Complications from legally-induced abortion: a review.

Authors:  D A Grimes; W Cates
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  The efficacy and tolerance of mifepristone and prostaglandin in first trimester termination of pregnancy. UK Multicentre Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-06

Review 3.  Antiprogestational steroids: a new dimension in human fertility regulation.

Authors:  P F Van Look; M Bygdeman
Journal:  Oxf Rev Reprod Biol       Date:  1989

4.  Comparison of complication rates in first trimester abortions performed by physician assistants and physicians.

Authors:  M A Freedman; D A Jillson; R R Coffin; L F Novick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Research on regimens for early medical abortion.

Authors:  H von Hertzen
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

6.  Medical abortion alternatives to mifepristone.

Authors:  M D Creinin; H C Pymar
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

7.  Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomized trial.

Authors:  E A Schaff; S L Fielding; C Westhoff; C Ellertson; S H Eisinger; L S Stadalius; L Fuller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Termination of early pregnancy by the progesterone antagonist RU 486 (Mifepristone).

Authors:  B Couzinet; N Le Strat; A Ulmann; E E Baulieu; G Schaison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.

Authors:  R C Henshaw; S A Naji; I T Russell; A A Templeton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-18

10.  Women's evaluation of three early abortion methods.

Authors:  K Holmgren
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  3 in total

1.  Medical Abortion-An Alternative to Surgical Abortion.

Authors:  K Kapur; G S Joneja; M Biswas
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 2.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 3.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Regina Kulier; Nathalie Kapp; A Metin Gülmezoglu; G Justus Hofmeyr; Linan Cheng; Aldo Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.