PURPOSE: Metallic esophageal stents frequently present during the treatment of esophageal cancer while using either external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. The dosimetric effects due to these metallic stents have not been reported. This work investigates these dose effects for various stent models presented during a radiotherapy procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two types of representative stent models, shell and ring stents, with various designs (e.g., composition and shell thickness or ring spacing), were studied. Three Monte Carlo code systems (EGS4/BEAM, EGSnrc/DOSRZnrc, and MCNP) were used to calculate the dose distributions for 6- and 15-MV external photon beams and for a (192)Ir brachytherapy source with and without a metallic esophageal stent in place. RESULTS: For a single external beam, a dose enhancement is generally observed in front of the stent (upstream) in the region within 4-mm distance of the stent surface. The enhancement at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface can be as high as 20%. The dose behind the stent (downstream) is generally reduced. For a parallel-opposed pair (POP), a dose enhancement is always observed in the region within 3-mm distance of the stent surface. The enhancement at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface can be as high as 10% for the 15-MV POP and 8% for the 6-MV POP. The dose effects depend on stent design (e.g., composition, thickness of shell stent, or ring spacing in ring stents). This dependence is reduced for a POP. In the case of the (192)Ir brachytherapy source, a dose enhancement is observed in the region within 1-mm distance from the stent surface. The dose enhancement is approximately 5% at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface. CONCLUSION: The dose perturbations due to the presence of a metallic esophageal stent during the treatment of esophageal cancer while using either external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy should be recognized. These perturbations result in an overdose in esophageal mucosa. The overdose is within 5%-10% at a depth of 0.5 mm in the esophageal wall.
PURPOSE: Metallic esophageal stents frequently present during the treatment of esophageal cancer while using either external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. The dosimetric effects due to these metallic stents have not been reported. This work investigates these dose effects for various stent models presented during a radiotherapy procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two types of representative stent models, shell and ring stents, with various designs (e.g., composition and shell thickness or ring spacing), were studied. Three Monte Carlo code systems (EGS4/BEAM, EGSnrc/DOSRZnrc, and MCNP) were used to calculate the dose distributions for 6- and 15-MV external photon beams and for a (192)Ir brachytherapy source with and without a metallic esophageal stent in place. RESULTS: For a single external beam, a dose enhancement is generally observed in front of the stent (upstream) in the region within 4-mm distance of the stent surface. The enhancement at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface can be as high as 20%. The dose behind the stent (downstream) is generally reduced. For a parallel-opposed pair (POP), a dose enhancement is always observed in the region within 3-mm distance of the stent surface. The enhancement at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface can be as high as 10% for the 15-MV POP and 8% for the 6-MV POP. The dose effects depend on stent design (e.g., composition, thickness of shell stent, or ring spacing in ring stents). This dependence is reduced for a POP. In the case of the (192)Ir brachytherapy source, a dose enhancement is observed in the region within 1-mm distance from the stent surface. The dose enhancement is approximately 5% at 0.5-mm distance from the stent surface. CONCLUSION: The dose perturbations due to the presence of a metallic esophageal stent during the treatment of esophageal cancer while using either external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy should be recognized. These perturbations result in an overdose in esophageal mucosa. The overdose is within 5%-10% at a depth of 0.5 mm in the esophageal wall.
Authors: Ewen A Griffiths; Catherine J Gregory; Kishore G Pursnani; Jeremy B Ward; Robert C Stockwell Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sujai Jalaj; Sang Yeob Lee; Camille McGaw; Bijo K John; Zuofeng Li; Ziad T Awad; James S Scolapio; Juan C Munoz Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2014-10-24
Authors: Samual R Francis; Christopher J Anker; Brian Wang; Greg V Williams; Kristen Cox; Douglas G Adler; Dennis C Shrieve; Bill J Salter Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 2.102