Literature DB >> 12419272

Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants.

C M Tuttlebee1, M J O'Donnell, C T Keane, R J Russell, D J Sullivan, F Falkiner, D C Coleman.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to < or =200 cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184 cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300 cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000 cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15 h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200 cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use. Copyright 2002 The Hospital Infection Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419272     DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review on bio-aerosols in healthcare and the dental environment.

Authors:  Charifa Zemouri; Hans de Soet; Wim Crielaard; Alexa Laheij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Monitoring dental-unit-water-line output water by current in-office test kits.

Authors:  Sham Lal; Sim K Singhrao; Matt Bricknell; Mark Pearce; L H Glyn Morton; Waqar Ahmed; St John Crean
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Microbiology, genomics, and clinical significance of the Pseudomonas fluorescens species complex, an unappreciated colonizer of humans.

Authors:  Brittan S Scales; Robert P Dickson; John J LiPuma; Gary B Huffnagle
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Investigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units.

Authors:  Nihal Dogruöz Güngör; Duygu Göksay Kadaifçiler; Oya Öztan Peker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union.

Authors:  A J Schel; P D Marsh; D J Bradshaw; M Finney; M R Fulford; E Frandsen; E Østergaard; J M ten Cate; W R Moorer; A Mavridou; J J Kamma; G Mandilara; L Stösser; S Kneist; R Araujo; N Contreras; P Goroncy-Bermes; D O'Mullane; F Burke; P O'Reilly; G Hourigan; M O'Sullivan; R Holman; J T Walker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Biofilm: A dental microbial infection.

Authors:  Rajiv Saini; Santosh Saini; Sugandha Sharma
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2011-01

7.  Bacteriostatic effects of nanometer silver disinfectant on the biofilms in dental unit water lines.

Authors:  Lujin Cheng; Nijiatijiang Naibijiang; Aletengguli Hasenbai; Hongbin Dong; Huiyu He
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.080

8.  Potential of Carvacrol and Thymol in Reducing Biofilm Formation on Technical Surfaces.

Authors:  Maciej Walczak; Marta Michalska-Sionkowska; Daria Olkiewicz; Patrycja Tarnawska; Oliwia Warżyńska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.

Authors:  Raha Habib Agahi; Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour; Mahsa Kalantari; Amin Ayatollah-Mosavi; Hossein Aghassi; Amir Hossein Gandjalikhan Nassab
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-05

10.  Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment.

Authors:  Jessica Lizzadro; Marta Mazzotta; Luna Girolamini; Ada Dormi; Tiziana Pellati; Sandra Cristino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.