Literature DB >> 12419130

A cross-linguistic FMRI study of spectral and temporal cues underlying phonological processing.

Jack Gandour1, Donald Wong, Mark Lowe, Mario Dzemidzic, Nakarin Satthamnuwong, Yunxia Tong, Xiaojian Li.   

Abstract

It remains a matter of controversy precisely what kind of neural mechanisms underlie functional asymmetries in speech processing. Whereas some studies support speech-specific circuits, others suggest that lateralization is dictated by relative computational demands of complex auditory signals in the spectral or time domains. To examine how the brain processes linguistically relevant spectral and temporal information, a functional magnetic resonance imaging study was conducted using Thai speech, in which spectral processing associated with lexical tones and temporal processing associated with vowel length can be differentiated. Ten Thai and 10 Chinese subjects were asked to perform discrimination judgments of pitch and timing patterns presented in the same auditory stimuli under two different conditions: speech (Thai) and nonspeech (hums). In the speech condition, tasks required judging Thai tones (T) and vowel length (VL); in the nonspeech condition, homologous pitch contours (P) and duration patterns (D). A remaining task required listening passively to nonspeech hums (L). Only the Thai group showed activation in the left inferior prefrontal cortex in speech minus nonspeech contrasts for spectral (T vs. P) and temporal (VL vs. D) cues. Thai and Chinese groups, however, exhibited similar fronto-parietal activation patterns in nonspeech hums minus passive listening contrasts for spectral (P vs. L) and temporal (D vs. L) cues. It appears that lower level specialization for acoustic cues in the spectral and temporal domains cannot be generalized to abstract higher order levels of phonological processing. Regardless of the neural mechanisms underlying low-level auditory processing, our findings clearly indicate that hemispheric specialization is sensitive to language-specific factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419130     DOI: 10.1162/089892902320474526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  34 in total

1.  Neural correlates of segmental and tonal information in speech perception.

Authors:  Jack Gandour; Yisheng Xu; Donald Wong; Mario Dzemidzic; Mark Lowe; Xiaojian Li; Yunxia Tong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation.

Authors:  Donald J Bolger; Charles A Perfetti; Walter Schneider
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; Angela R Laird; Karl Li; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian.

Authors:  Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer; Christian J Fiebach; Vera Kempe; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Differential activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for pseudowords and real words: an event-related fMRI study on auditory lexical decision.

Authors:  Zhuangwei Xiao; John X Zhang; Xiaoyi Wang; Renhua Wu; Xiaoping Hu; Xuchu Weng; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants.

Authors:  Hao Luo; Jing-Tian Ni; Zhi-Hao Li; Xiao-Ou Li; Da-Ren Zhang; Fan-Gang Zeng; Lin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Common and distinct neural substrates for the perception of speech rhythm and intonation.

Authors:  Linjun Zhang; Hua Shu; Fengying Zhou; Xiaoyi Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Hsuan-Chih Chen; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.