Literature DB >> 12418737

Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields?

Roger Luechinger1, Firat Duru, Volkert A Zeijlemaker, Markus B Scheidegger, Peter Boesiger, Reto Candinas.   

Abstract

MRI is established as an important diagnostic tool in medicine. However, the presence of a cardiac pacemaker is usually regarded as a contraindication for MRI due to safety reasons. The aim of this study was to investigate the state of a pacemaker reed switch in different orientations and positions in the main magnetic field of 0.5-, 1.5-, and 3.0-T MRI scanners. Reed switches used in current pacemakers and ICDs were tested in 0.5-, 1.5-, and 3.0-T MRI scanners. The closure of isolated reed switches was evaluated for different orientations and positions relative to the main magnetic field. The field strengths to close and open the reed switch and the orientation dependency of the closed state inside the main magnetic field were investigated. The measurements were repeated using two intact pacemakers to evaluate the potential influence of the other magnetic components, like the battery. If the reed switches were oriented parallel to the magnetic fields, they closed at 1.0 +/- 0.2 mT and opened at 0.7 +/- 0.2 mT. Two different reed switch behaviors were observed at different magnetic field strengths. In low magnetic fields (< 50 mT), the reed switches were closed. However, in high magnetic fields (> 200 mT), the reed switches opened in 50% of all tested orientations. No difference between the three scanners could be demonstrated. The reed switches showed the same behavior whether they were isolated or an integral part of the pacemakers. The reed switch in a pacemaker or an ICD does not necessarily remain closed in strong magnetic fields at 0.5, 1.5, or 3.0 T and the state of the reed switch may not be predictable with certainty in clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12418737     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  16 in total

1.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach.

Authors:  Barry Anthony Boilson; Anita Wokhlu; Nancy G Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Robert E Watson; Paul R Julsrud; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; David L Hayes; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems].

Authors:  M Dorenkamp; M Roser; B Hamm; W Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  More than one dilemma.

Authors:  Robert D Henderson; David G Walker; Ken Mitchell; Stephan J Read
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [Safe MRI examinations in patients with pacemakers and ICD].

Authors:  D Beitzke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  [Pacemaker and MRI in clinical practice].

Authors:  A Fendt; M Strauß; K Kouraki; R Zahn; T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  MRI in patients with pacemakers: overview and procedural management.

Authors:  Henning Bovenschulte; Klaus Schlüter-Brust; Thomas Liebig; Erland Erdmann; Peer Eysel; Carsten Zobel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging conditional pacemakers: rationale, development and future directions.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.