Literature DB >> 12417459

ERP 'old/new' effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s).

Simon Finnigan1, Michael S Humphreys, Simon Dennis, Gina Geffen.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once ('weak') or three times ('strong'). The probability of an 'old' response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This 'N400 strength effect' was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12417459     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00113-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  49 in total

1.  Compensatory processing during rule-based category learning in older adults.

Authors:  Krishna L Bharani; Ken A Paller; Paul J Reber; Sandra Weintraub; Jorge Yanar; Robert G Morrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 2.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

3.  The memory that's right and the memory that's left: event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information.

Authors:  Karen M Evans; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

6.  Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Race; David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Repetition and brain potentials when recognizing natural scenes: task and emotion differences.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Marie Karlsson; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Mikael Johansson; Michael Weigl; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Gian Daniele Zannino; Ettore Ambrosini
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Is what goes in what comes out? Encoding and retrieval event-related potentials together determine memory outcome.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chen; Kirstie Lithgow; Jumjury A Hemmerich; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.