Literature DB >> 12416649

Zygote versus embryo transfer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Brian Dale1, Agnese Fiorentino, Maria Laura de Simone, Loredana di Matteo, Antonio Scotto di Frega, Martin Wilding, Peter Fehr, Emma Bassan, Cristoforo Lo Giudice, Antonio Maselli, Fulvio Cappiello, Fulvio Zullo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficiency of transferring human zygotes as opposed to human day 2 or 3 embryos.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, Multicenter trial. Patients were randomized into zygote or embryo transfer. Patients were prepared for oocyte retrieval using standardized protocols. Oocyte retrieval was performed under general anesthesia. Oocytes and spermatozoa were treated using standard laboratory techniques. All protocols were coordinated by the coordinating center.
RESULTS: A total of 386 patients were included in the trial. Pregnancy rates were 36.5% after zygote transfer and 42% after embryo transfer. Implantation rates were equivalent (17%) in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No general difference was observed for zygote or embryo transfer. The results suggest that zygote transfer is a valid alternative to embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12416649      PMCID: PMC3455685          DOI: 10.1023/a:1020354318164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  20 in total

1.  Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law.

Authors:  M Ludwig; B Schöpper; S Al-Hasani; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology.

Authors:  J Tesarik; A M Junca; A Hazout; F X Aubriot; C Nathan; P Cohen-Bacrie; M Dumont-Hassan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology.

Authors:  J Tesarik; E Greco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Reproductive capacity of spermatozoa from men with testicular failure.

Authors:  F Ubaldi; Z P Nagy; L Rienzi; J Tesarik; R Anniballo; G Franco; F Menchini-Fabris; E Greco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality.

Authors:  J M Cummins; T M Breen; K L Harrison; J M Shaw; L M Wilson; J F Hennessey
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1986-10

6.  Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage.

Authors:  A Senn; C Vozzi; A Chanson; P De Grandi; M Germond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Blastocyst transfer following intracytoplasmic injection of ejaculated, epididymal or testicular spermatozoa.

Authors:  B Balaban; B Urman; A Isiklar; C Alatas; R Mercan; S Aksoy; A Nuhoglu
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF.

Authors:  H Laverge; P De Sutter; J Van der Elst; M Dhont
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Successful pregnancies from the transfer of pronucleate embryos in an outpatient in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  K K Ahuja; W Smith; M Tucker; I Craft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Establishing full-term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitro.

Authors:  R G Edwards; P C Steptoe; J M Purdy
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  An oocyte score for use in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Martin Wilding; Loredana Di Matteo; Sonia D'Andretti; Nadia Montanaro; Clemente Capobianco; Brian Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.