Literature DB >> 11056238

Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage.

A Senn1, C Vozzi, A Chanson, P De Grandi, M Germond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cumulative live birth rates obtained after cryopreservation of either pronucleate (PN) zygotes or early-cleavage (EC) embryos.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Three hundred eighty-two patients, involved in an IVF/ICSI program from January 1993 to December 1995, who had their supernumerary embryos cryopreserved either at the PN (group I) or EC (group II) stage. For 89 patients, cryopreservation of EC embryos was canceled because of poor embryo development (group III). Frozen-thawed embryo transfers performed up to December 1998 were considered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age, oocytes, zygotes, cryopreserved and transferred embryos, damage after thawing, cumulative embryo scores, implantation, and cumulative live birth rates. RESULT(S): The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar in all groups after fresh embryo transfers. Significantly higher implantation (10.5% vs. 5.9%) and pregnancy rates (19.5% vs. 10.9%; P< or = .02 per transfer after cryopreserved embryo transfers were obtained in group I versus group II, leading to higher cumulative pregnancy (55.5% vs. 38.6%; P < or = .002 and live birth rates (46.9% vs. 27.7%; P< or = .0001. CONCLUSION(S): The transfer of a maximum of three unselected embryos and freezing of all supernumerary PN zygotes can be safely done with significantly higher cumulative pregnancy chances than cryopreserving at a later EC stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11056238     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01603-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Zygote versus embryo transfer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Brian Dale; Agnese Fiorentino; Maria Laura de Simone; Loredana di Matteo; Antonio Scotto di Frega; Martin Wilding; Peter Fehr; Emma Bassan; Cristoforo Lo Giudice; Antonio Maselli; Fulvio Cappiello; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pronuclear synchronization and nuclear morphology of mature and in vitro matured oocytes in the rat: an ultrastructural study.

Authors:  M Cincik; B Baykal; S Zeteroglu; G Onalan; S T Ceyhan; R Ergur
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Delivery of a healthy newborn using vitrified zygotes that developed from in vitro matured oocytes retrieved from a patient with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yoshida; Nobuya Aono; Yasuhisa Araki; Takako Naganuma
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2003-04-30

4.  Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Pavone; Joy Innes; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Ralph Kazer; John Zhang
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-01

Review 5.  Preservation of fertility in females treated for cancer.

Authors:  Yunhai Chuai; Xiaobin Xu; Aiming Wang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 6.  Toward precision medicine for preserving fertility in cancer patients: existing and emerging fertility preservation options for women.

Authors:  So-Youn Kim; Seul Ki Kim; Jung Ryeol Lee; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.