Literature DB >> 12415723

Representations of health concepts: a cognitive perspective.

Jiajie Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper studies the differences between controlled medical vocabularies that are designed as external artifacts and the mental concepts that are inside users' heads and used by users for reasoning, decision making, diagnosis, and treatment.
DESIGN: The major theories of concept representations developed in cognitive science were reviewed, analyzed, and compared with the major controlled medical vocabularies developed in medicine.
RESULTS: It was found that there are significant mismatches between controlled medical vocabularies that are designed as external artifacts and the mental concepts that are inside users' heads and used by users for reasoning, decision making, diagnosis, and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Controlled medical vocabularies should be designed with systematical considerations of the cognitive structures and processes of the users. Without such considerations, the designed vocabularies will not be appropriate for people because they are hard to use, although they may or may not be appropriate for machine processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12415723     DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  6 in total

1.  Cognitive evaluation of the predictors of use of computerized protocols by clinicians.

Authors:  Shobba Satsangi; Charlene R Weir; Alan H Morris; Homer R Warner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Eneida A Mendonça; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Empirical distributional semantics: methods and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Trevor Cohen; Dominic Widdows
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Using Pathfinder networks to discover alignment between expert and consumer conceptual knowledge from online vaccine content.

Authors:  Muhammad Amith; Rachel Cunningham; Lara S Savas; Julie Boom; Roger Schvaneveldt; Cui Tao; Trevor Cohen
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection.

Authors:  Shobha Phansalkar; Jennifer M Hoffman; John F Hurdle; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Chapter 1: Biomedical knowledge integration.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.