Literature DB >> 12415436

Effect of temperature on ultrasonic properties of the calcaneus in situ.

P H F Nicholson1, M L Bouxsein.   

Abstract

To assess the dependence of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) on foot temperature, a series of acoustic measurements were made in five cadaver feet in situ (all soft tissues retained) over a temperature range of 25 degrees C to 40 degrees C in steps of 5 degrees C. An implanted probe was used to measured temperature directly in the calcaneus itself. Ultrasound velocity decreased linearly with increasing temperature, with a mean thermal coefficient of -2.2 m/s/ degrees C. In contrast, broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) increased with temperature with a mean thermal coefficient of +0.75 dB/MHz/ degrees C. We argue that the temperature trends in velocity are likely to be due to the influence of fat, present in the bone marrow and in the soft tissues, which has a negative thermal coefficient for acoustic velocity. The attenuation trends may arise, in part, from greater scattering losses inside the cancellous bone due to an increased acoustic impedance mismatch between trabeculae and fatty marrow at higher temperatures. These considerations suggest that the greatest temperature effects may be expected in patients with a high proportion of fat within the measured volume and/or low calcaneal bone density. Given the magnitude of the thermal coefficients observed, the clinical impact of temperature-related QUS errors is likely to be modest for diagnostic purposes but of greater significance in follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12415436     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  7 in total

1.  A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement.

Authors:  C Pongchaiyakul; S Panichkul; T Songpatanasilp; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A-Mode ultrasound guidance for pedicle screw advancement in ovine vertebral bodies.

Authors:  David T Raphael; Jin Ho Chang; Yao Ping Zhang; David Kudija; Thomas C Chen; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Moayyeri; J E Adams; R A Adler; M-A Krieg; D Hans; J Compston; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  The reduction in treatment efficiency at high acoustic powers during MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound thalamotomy for Essential Tremor.

Authors:  Alec Hughes; Yuexi Huang; Michael L Schwartz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A Noninvasive Ultrasound Resonance Method for Detecting Skull Induced Phase Shifts May Provide a Signal for Adaptive Focusing.

Authors:  Lulu Deng; Alec Hughes; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Ultrasound in sports medicine: relevance of emerging techniques to clinical care of athletes.

Authors:  Eugene Sun Yim; Gianmichael Corrado
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 11.928

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.