Literature DB >> 12415136

Measurement of quality of care and quality of life at the end of life.

Virginia P Tilden1, Susan Tolle, Linda Drach, Susan Hickman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Consumers and providers demand better indicators for quality of care and quality of life at the end of life. This article presents recommendations for advancing the science of measurement at end of life. DESIGN AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the extant literature and applied the Institute of Medicine's conceptual framework for national health care quality to end-of-life care and research.
RESULTS: Ten recommendations were developed, charting a course for research that will improve the quality of care delivered and, consequently, the quality of life experienced at life's end. IMPLICATIONS: Measurement bridges the conceptual and operational levels of scientific research, clinical care, and quality improvement. Although a large amount of psychometric groundwork has been laid in the field of end-of-life research, the next wave of studies will ideally take measurement at end of life to a higher level of rigor and precision.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12415136     DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  7 in total

1.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Shared priorities for the end-of-life period.

Authors:  Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care--users' cry for help.

Authors:  Claudia Bausewein; Steffen T Simon; Hamid Benalia; Julia Downing; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Barbara A Daveson; Richard Harding; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Palliative Care Experience in the Last 3 Months of Life: A Quantitative Comparison of Care Provided in Residential Hospices, Hospitals, and the Home From the Perspectives of Bereaved Caregivers.

Authors:  Daryl Bainbridge; Hsien Seow
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The Japan hospice and palliative evaluation study 4: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kento Masukawa; Maho Aoyama; Tatsuya Morita; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Satoru Tsuneto; Yasuo Shima; Mitsunori Miyashita
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Caregiver evaluation of the quality of end-of-life care (CEQUEL) scale: the caregiver's perception of patient care near death.

Authors:  Philip C Higgins; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of a modified VOICES survey to measure end-of-life care quality: the CaregiverVoice survey.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Daryl Bainbridge; Melissa Brouwers; Gregory Pond; John Cairney
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.234

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.