Literature DB >> 12413875

Estimating the instability parameters of plasmid-bearing cells. I. Chemostat culture.

Vitaly V Ganusov1, Anatoly V Brilkov.   

Abstract

What determines the stability of plasmid-bearing cells in natural and laboratory conditions? In order to answer this question in a quantitative manner, we need tools allowing the estimation of parameters governing plasmid loss in different environments. In the present work, we have developed two methods for the estimation of the instability parameters of plasmid-bearing cells growing in chemostat. These instability parameters are: (i) selection coefficient (or cost of the plasmid)alpha and (ii) the probability of plasmid loss at cell division tau(0). We have found that generally selection coefficient alpha changes during elimination of plasmid-bearing cells due to changes in substrate concentration; hence, methods which assume constancy of alpha are intrinsically imprecise. Instead, one can estimate selection coefficient at the beginning and the end of cultivation when the substrate concentration is approximately constant. Applying developed techniques to two sets of experimental data, we have found that (i) the cost of the plasmid pBR322 depended on the dilution rate in chemostat and was higher at low dilutions; (ii) high levels of plasmid gene expression led to a high cost of the plasmid pPHL-7; (iii) the probability of plasmid loss was lower at high levels of plasmid gene expression and independent of the dilution rate. We have also discussed the application of our results to understanding the basic biology of bacterial plasmids.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413875     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  7 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity in bacterial plasmids.

Authors:  Paul E Turner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The population biology of bacterial plasmids: a hidden Markov model approach.

Authors:  José M Ponciano; Leen De Gelder; Eva M Top; Paul Joyce
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A model of bacterial cell cycle duration based on DnaA dynamics and estimation of the population cost of bacterial plasmids.

Authors:  A N Shuvaev; A V Brilkov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.788

4.  Engineered probiotics for local tumor delivery of checkpoint blockade nanobodies.

Authors:  Candice R Gurbatri; Ioana Lia; Rosa Vincent; Courtney Coker; Samuel Castro; Piper M Treuting; Taylor E Hinchliffe; Nicholas Arpaia; Tal Danino
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Dynamics of HBV cccDNA expression and transcription in different cell growth phase.

Authors:  Chin-Liew Chong; Mong-Liang Chen; Yi-Chieh Wu; Kuen-Nan Tsai; Chien-Chiao Huang; Cheng-Po Hu; King-Song Jeng; Yu-Chi Chou; Chungming Chang
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 8.410

6.  Quantifying Limits on Replication, Death, and Quiescence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice.

Authors:  Margaret M McDaniel; Nitin Krishna; Winode G Handagama; Shigetoshi Eda; Vitaly V Ganusov
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  A Multiplex Genome Editing Method for Escherichia coli Based on CRISPR-Cas12a.

Authors:  Xiang Ao; Yi Yao; Tian Li; Ting-Ting Yang; Xu Dong; Ze-Tong Zheng; Guo-Qiang Chen; Qiong Wu; Yingying Guo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.