| Literature DB >> 27379030 |
Margaret M McDaniel1, Nitin Krishna2, Winode G Handagama3, Shigetoshi Eda4, Vitaly V Ganusov5.
Abstract
When an individual is exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) three outcomes are possible: bacterial clearance, active disease, or latent infection. It is generally believed that most individuals exposed to Mtb become latently infected and carry the mycobacteria for life. How Mtb is maintained during this latent infection remains largely unknown. During an Mtb infection in mice, there is a phase of rapid increase in bacterial numbers in the murine lungs within the first 3 weeks, and then bacterial numbers either stabilize or increase slowly over the period of many months. It has been debated whether the relatively constant numbers of bacteria in the chronic infection result from latent (dormant, quiescent), non-replicating bacteria, or whether the observed Mtb cell numbers are due to balance between rapid replication and death. A recent study of mice, infected with a Mtb strain carrying an unstable plasmid, showed that during the chronic phase, Mtb was replicating at significant rates. Using experimental data from this study and mathematical modeling we investigated the limits of the rates of bacterial replication, death, and quiescence during Mtb infection of mice. First, we found that to explain the data the rates of bacterial replication and death could not be constant and had to decrease with time since infection unless there were large changes in plasmid segregation probability over time. While a decrease in the rate of Mtb replication with time since infection was expected due to depletion of host's resources, a decrease in the Mtb death rate was counterintuitive since Mtb-specific immune response, appearing in the lungs 3-4 weeks after infection, should increase removal of bacteria. Interestingly, we found no significant correlation between estimated rates of Mtb replication and death suggesting the decline in these rates was driven by independent mechanisms. Second, we found that the data could not be explained by assuming that bacteria do not die, suggesting that some removal of bacteria from lungs of these mice had to occur even though the total bacterial counts in these mice always increased over time. Third and finally, we showed that to explain the data the majority of bacterial cells (at least ~60%) must be replicating in the chronic phase of infection further challenging widespread belief of nonreplicating Mtb in latency. Our predictions were robust to some changes in the structure of the model, for example, when the loss of plasmid-bearing cells was mainly due to high fitness cost of the plasmid. Further studies should determine if more mechanistic models for Mtb dynamics are also able to accurately explain these data.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; chronic infection; death rate; mathematical model; mouse; pathogenesis; plasmid loss; replication rate
Year: 2016 PMID: 27379030 PMCID: PMC4906525 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Kinetics of Mtb replication in mice (Gill et al., . Mice were infected intranasally with a low dose of Mtb strain H37Rv carrying a plasmid pBP10; the plasmid was lost by bacteria at cell division. Data are for the total number of bacteria and number of plasmid-bearing bacteria in the murine lungs (A) or the percent of plasmid-bearing cells in the population (B). Markers denote measurements for individual mice (n = 5 per time point) and lines are connecting geometric means of bacterial counts. The total deviation of the log10-transformed data from the geometric mean in (A) is 3.26, and therefore according to the lack of fit test, best fit models should have the sum of squared residuals close to this value (Bates and Watts, 1988).
Figure 2Cartoon of the general mathematical model of Mtb dynamics in mice. In the model, plasmid-bearing (P) and plasmid-free (F) bacteria replicate and die at rates r and δ, respectively, and plasmid-free bacteria are formed during a division of plasmid-carrying cell with the probability s. We consider two versions of the general model. In our first version (extended model) q = 0 and rates r and δ and probability s could all be time-dependent (see Equations 1 and 2) while the original study of Gill et al. (2009) had a constant segregation probability s. In the second version (quiescence model) we allow formation of quiescent cells, P and F, following cell division with a probability q > 0 (see Equations 7–10). In the quiescence model, the rates r and δ and probability q could be time-dependent, while probability of plasmid loss was fixed to a value determined from in vitro experiments, s = 0.18 (Gill et al., 2009).
Bootstrap analysis suggested non-significant changes in the rates of Mtb replication and death for several time periods.
| < 10−4 | δ1, δ2 | < 10−4 | |
| 0.0064 | δ2, δ3 | 0.11 | |
| 0.19 | δ3, δ4 | 0.19 |
We resampled experimental data of Gill et al. (2009) 104 times with replacement and generated distribution of estimates for replication (r) and death (δ) rates during four time periods assuming a fixed segregation probability s = 0.18. The indicated p-values are calculated from the distribution of differences between two consecutive rates.
Fitting the extended mathematical model to experimental data suggested that few parameters were needed to explain the data.
| Full Model | (day−1) | δ1 | δ2 | δ3 | δ4 | AIC | SSR | ||||
| 0.78 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.46 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.16 | −116.98 | 3.26 | ||
| Constrained Model 1 | (day−1) | δ1 | δ2 | AIC | SSR | ||||||
| 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.13 | −124.72 | 3.29 | |||||
| Constrained Model 2 | (day−1) | δ1 | δ2 | AIC | SSR | ||||||
| 0.49 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.20 | −114.45 | 4.24 | ||||||
| Constrained Model 3 | (day−1) | δ1 | AIC | SSR | |||||||
| 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.19 | −116.51 | 4.27 |
Assuming s = 0.18 we numerically solved the model given in Equations (1) and (2), fitted model solutions to the data on dynamics of the total number of bacteria and the number of plasmid-bearing bacteria (Figure 1A), and estimated model parameters (see Equation 4). Resulting parameters, the sum of squared residuals (SSR), and AIC scores for the model fits are indicated in columns. The lowest AIC score was provided by Constrained Model 1 (“3r∕2δ” model), with three replication (r1, r2, r3) and 2 death (δ1, δ2) rates which is similar to the results found in Table 1. This model could accurately describe experimental data based on the lack of fit test [F(3, 40) = 0.11, p = 0.95], and was not worse than the full model with four replication and four death rates [F-test for nested models, F(3, 40) = 0.11, p = 0.95]. Visually model fits were indistinguishable from lines shown in Figure 1A. For our minimal (“3r∕2δ”) model we have the following 95% confidence intervals obtained by bootstrapping the data with replacement 103 times: r1 = 0.72 (0.63−0.82)/day, r2 = 0.40 (0.33−0.49)/day, r3 = 0.14 (0.12−0.15)/day, δ1 = 0.40 (0.32−0.49)/day, δ2 = 0.13 (0.11−0.14)/day, P(0) = 200 (165–240), F(0) = 67 (26–107).
Estimates of Mtb replication and death rates strongly depended on the value for the plasmid segregation probability .
| 0.05 | 2.842 | 2.514 | 1.084 | 0.819 | 0.477 | 0.470 | 0.603 | 0.592 |
| 0.08 | 1.776 | 1.448 | 0.678 | 0.412 | 0.298 | 0.290 | 0.377 | 0.366 |
| 0.18 | 0.789 | 0.461 | 0.301 | 0.036 | 0.133 | 0.125 | 0.167 | 0.157 |
| 0.204 | 0.697 | 0.368 | 0.266 | 0.000 | 0.117 | 0.109 | 0.148 | 0.137 |
| 0.28 | 0.508 | 0.179 | 0.194 | −0.072 | 0.085 | 0.078 | 0.108 | 0.097 |
| 0.38 | 0.374 | 0.046 | 0.143 | −0.123 | 0.063 | 0.055 | 0.079 | 0.069 |
| 0.48 | 0.296 | −0.032 | 0.113 | −0.152 | 0.050 | 0.042 | 0.063 | 0.052 |
| 0.433 | 0.204 | 3.108 | 2.920 | |||||
We fixed the value of s = si and calculated replication ri and death δi rates using linear regressions in Equations (5) and (6). Gray boxes denote parameters outside physiologically feasible ranges. The value of segregation probability s yielding δi = 0 was the upper bound for s in that interval (smax). The smallest of these maximum values, smax = 0.204, was the upper bound for the segregation probability when it was constant throughout infection.
Figure 3Dramatic dependence of the estimated replication . We made assumptions on the value of a constant segregation probability s (A,B), constant replication rate r (C,D), and constant death rate δ (E,F) and estimated remaining parameters using linear regressions (Equations 5 and 6) from experimental data (Figure 1A). Gray areas of each plot denote values that are physiologically impossible. Plotted values were also listed in Tables 3–5.
Data could not be explained assuming immortal bacteria.
| 0 | 0.433 | 0.328 | 0.204 | 0.265 | 3.108 | 0.008 | 2.920 | 0.010 |
| 0.05 | 0.376 | 0.378 | 0.172 | 0.315 | 0.141 | 0.108 | 0.499 | 0.060 |
| 0.25 | 0.246 | 0.578 | 0.105 | 0.515 | 0.093 | 0.258 | 0.116 | 0.260 |
| 0.5 | 0.172 | 0.828 | 0.071 | 0.765 | 0.047 | 0.508 | 0.059 | 0.510 |
| 1 | 0.107 | 1.328 | 0.043 | 1.265 | 0.024 | 1.008 | 0.030 | 1.010 |
| 5 | 0.027 | 5.328 | 0.010 | 5.265 | 0.005 | 5.008 | 0.006 | 5.010 |
| 10 | 0.014 | 10.328 | 0.005 | 10.265 | 0.002 | 10.008 | 0.003 | 10.010 |
We fixed the value of the death rate δ = δi and calculated segregation probability si and replication rate δi using linear regressions with Equations (5) and (6) and experimental data (Figure 1A). Parameters combinations highlighted by gray boxes were are outside physiologically feasible ranges. The minimal constant rate of Mtb death was δ ≈ 0.05 day−1. For a constant death rate, the segregation probability must have declined 3–5 fold during infection for the model to be consistent with the data.
Replication rate of Mtb replication was unlikely to be constant during Mtb infection of mice.
| 0.05 | 2.841 | −0.278 | 1.083 | −0.215 | 0.477 | 0.042 | 0.603 | 0.039 |
| 0.25 | 0.569 | −0.078 | 0.217 | −0.015 | 0.095 | 0.242 | 0.121 | 0.240 |
| 0.328 | 0.433 | 0.000 | 0.165 | 0.063 | 0.073 | 0.320 | 0.092 | 0.318 |
| 0.5 | 0.284 | 0.172 | 0.108 | 0.235 | 0.048 | 0.492 | 0.060 | 0.490 |
| 1 | 0.142 | 0.672 | 0.054 | 0.735 | 0.024 | 0.992 | 0.030 | 0.990 |
| 5 | 0.028 | 4.672 | 0.011 | 4.735 | 0.005 | 4.992 | 0.006 | 4.990 |
| 10 | 0.014 | 9.672 | 0.005 | 9.735 | 0.002 | 9.992 | 0.003 | 9.990 |
We fixed the value of replication rate r = ri and calculated segregation probability si and death rate δi using linear regressions with Equations (5) and (6). Parameters combinations highlighted by gray boxes were outside physiologically feasible ranges. The minimal constant rate of Mtb replication was 0.328 day−1. For a constant replication rate, the segregation probability must have declined 5–7 fold during infection for the model to be consistent with the data.
Figure 4Quiescence model accurately predicted the dynamics of total number of bacteria (A), number of plasmid-bearing bacteria (B), and the percent of plasmid-bearing cells in the population (C) for a range of quiescence probabilities. We fitted the mathematical model given in Equations (7–10) to experimental data (Figure 1A) for a fixed value of segregation probability s = 0.18 and different fixed values of the quiescence probability q and estimated rates of Mtb replication r and death δ for four different time periods for our minimal 3r∕2δ model (see Equation 4 and Table 2). Estimated model parameters are shown in Table 6 for “Quiescent” model. Markers show experimental data and lines are the model predictions. Model fits for several different values of the quiescence rate are shown and values in square brackets are the percent of bacteria at day 111 which are in the quiescent state. Fits were of a similar quality for models in which bacteria become quiescent only in the chronic phase of infection [q(t) = 0 if t < 26 and q(t) = q, otherwise], when quiescent bacteria are not counted during in vitro plating, or when all different values are allowed for replication and death rates for the four time intervals (see Table 6 and results not shown).
Analysis predicted a high fraction of quiescent bacteria in the chronic phase of infection.
| 0 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.13 | −124.72 | 3.29 | 0 | |
| 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.14 | −124.35 | 3.31 | 8.06 | |
| 0.025 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.16 | −123.50 | 3.37 | 24.73 | |
| 0.05 | 0.75 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.18 | −121.22 | 3.52 | 46.77 | |
| 0.1 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.45 | 0.18 | −117.28 | 3.82 | 73.35 | |
| 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.14 | −124.51 | 3.31 | 8.66 | |
| 0.025 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.15 | −124.0 | 3.34 | 21.83 | |
| 0.05 | 0.73 | 0.44 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.17 | −122.72 | 3.42 | 42.67 | |
| 0.1 | 0.78 | 0.46 | 0.20 | 0.45 | 0.19 | −119.77 | 3.63 | 72.69 | |
| 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.12 | −124.64 | 3.29 | 31.55 | |
| 0.1 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.11 | −124.54 | 3.20 | 47.89 | |
| 0.2 | 0.69 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.10 | −124.27 | 3.32 | 64.59 |
We fitted the quiescence model (Equations 7–10) to experimental data (Figure 1A) with s = 0.18 and different values of q (indicated in the table) and estimated Mtb replication (r, day−1) and death (δ, day−1) rates for different time periods (see Equation 4) assuming that there are 3 replication and 2 death rates (see Table 2). In different fits we assumed that quiescent cells were formed during the whole infection [“Quiescent,” q(t) = q], quiescent cells were formed only in chronic phase of infection [“Quiescent Late,” q(t) = 0 if t < 26 and q(t) = q, otherwise], quiescent cells were formed during the whole infection but could not be counted during standard plating procedure [“Quiescent bacteria not counted,” q(t) = q].
Figure 5Absence of significant correlation between the rate of Mtb replication and rate of Mtb death during the infection. We estimated the rates of Mtb replication (r) and death (δ) for four time periods using linear regressions (Equations 5 and 6) and letting s = 0.18. These estimates are identical to those given in Gill et al. (2009). Statistical analysis of the correlation was performed using Spearman rank correlation with p-value indicated on the graph. Error bars denote confidence intervals for parameter estimates obtained by bootstrapping data from individual animals 104 times. The regression line was drawn for illustrative purposes.