Literature DB >> 12411884

Role of cranial base flexure in developing sagittal jaw discrepancies.

Arndt Klocke1, Ram S Nanda, Bärbel Kahl-Nieke.   

Abstract

The aim of this longitudinal cephalometric study was to investigate skeletal features in patients with small and large cranial base angles. Two groups of untreated subjects were formed on the basis of a small and large cranial base angle N-S-Ar at the age of 5 years: the large cranial base angle group (n = 22) consisted of subjects with an N-S-Ar angle larger than 125 degrees (mean, 128.1 degrees ), and the small cranial base angle group (n = 20) included subjects with an N-S-Ar angle of less than 120 degrees (mean, 117.6 degrees ). Cephalometric data of the 2 groups were analyzed at subject ages 5 and 12 years. At both ages, the groups showed significant differences of the variables SNA, SNB, individualized ANB, and Y axis. The unadjusted ANB angle and the angle of convexity N-A-Pg were not significantly different between the 2 groups. According to the individualized norm of the ANB angle, subjects with a large cranial base angle in the primary dentition demonstrated a skeletal Class II tendency both at the initial observation and at the longitudinal follow-up. On the basis of cephalometric variables at 12 years of age, it was possible to classify 88.1% of the initial large and small cranial base angle individuals, indicating a constancy of the skeletal pattern during the longitudinal follow-up. The relationship between cranial base flexure and skeletal pattern of the jaws seems to be established before the age of 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12411884     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Nodal pathway genes are down-regulated in facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Romain Nicot; Molly Hottenstein; Gwenael Raoul; Joel Ferri; Michael Horton; John W Tobias; Elisabeth Barton; Patrick Gelé; James J Sciote
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-08-18

3.  Cranial base measurements in different anteroposterior skeletal relationships using Bjork-Jarabak analysis.

Authors:  Emad F Al Maaitah; Sawsan Alomari; Susan N Al-Khateeb; Elham S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.684

4.  3D Evaluation of the Relationship between Different Vertical Growth Patterns and Cranial Base Angulations.

Authors:  Mehmet Ugurlu; Rıdvan Oksayan; Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar; Fatih Kahraman; Ilhan Metin Dagsuyu; Mehmet Aydın; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Alice Chin; Suzanne Perry; Chongshan Liao; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Amarjitsingh Bhatia; Dolly Patel; Nishit Mehta; Harshik Parekh; Rahul Trivedi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

7.  Morphological configuration of the cranial base among children aged 8 to 12 years.

Authors:  Lina Cossio; Jorge López; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Paola Botero-Mariaca
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-06-14

8.  Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Mohammad Monirifard; Saeid Sadeghian; Zahra Afshari; Elahe Rafiei; Asana Vali Sichani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

9.  Morphological features of Class I, II and III malocclusions of Saudi adolescents.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ayman A Al-Dharrab; Ahmed R Afify; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Hosam A Baeshen
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.219

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.