Literature DB >> 12410669

Undergraduate education in endodontology at two European dental schools. A comparison between the Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden and Faculty of Odontology, Paris 5 University (René Descartes), France.

Kerstin Petersson1, Helena Olsson, Christina Söderström, Isabelle Fouilloux, Nadège Jegat, Gérard Lévy.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the courses in endodontics and to assess the treatment quality in the student clinics in two dental schools, in Malmö, Sweden and Paris, France. A further aim was to improve the curriculum development in Paris 5 and Malmö by testing student exchange programmes. The comparison was based on the guidelines for undergraduate education set up by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) [Int. Endod. J. 25 (1992) 169] and on the criteria formulated by Qualtrough and Dummer [Int. Endod. J. 30 (1997) 234]. The latter criteria covered the following aspects: educational methods, the timing of endodontic teaching, pre-clinical practical exercises, student assessment, recommended literature, clinical/practical procedures, the education of the staff and number of students per teacher. The quality guidelines for endodontic treatment set up by the ESE [Int. Endod. J. 27 (1994) 115] were used for the assessment of the quality of the treatment. The following aspects were covered: history, diagnosis and treatment planning, records, infection control, root-canal treatment, assessment of endodontic treatment. The undergraduate education in endodontics was fundamentally similar in Paris 5 and Malmö. The main differences observed were related to: Educational methods: In Malmö, problem-based learning and in Paris 5, traditional. Assessment of student performance. In Malmö, self-assessment and in Paris 5, credits for clinical/practical procedures. Clinical/practical procedures relating to infection control. Aseptic treatment regimens were more meticulously performed in Malmö than in Paris 5. Assessment (follow-up) of all endodontic treatments was a routine only in Malmö.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410669     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2002.00261.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ        ISSN: 1396-5883            Impact factor:   2.355


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of Rubber Dam Usage during Endodontic Procedure: A Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Shashirekha G; Amit Jena; Asim Bikash Maity; Pankaj Kumar Panda
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  Effect of an endodontic e-learning application on students' performance during their first root canal treatment on real patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christoph Maria Färber; Martin Lemos; Sareh Said Yekta-Michael
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Use of contemporary technologies and new materials in undergraduate Endodontics teaching.

Authors:  Mari-Carmen Jiménez-Sánchez; Juan J Segura-Egea; Alicia Zarza-Rebollo; Victoria Areal-Quecuty; Paloma Montero-Miralles; Jenifer Martín-González; Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students at the Academy Dental Teaching Hospital, UMST, Sudan.

Authors:  Elhadi M Awooda; Reem I Siddig; Ruaa S Alturki; Nada M Sanhouri
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

5.  Use of artificial primary teeth for endodontic laboratory research: experiments related to canal length determination.

Authors:  Anna Carolina V Mello-Moura; Carmela R Bresolin; Cacio Moura-Netto; André Ito; Angela T Araki; José Carlos P Imparato; Fausto M Mendes
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  How to Improve Fine Motor Skill Learning in Dentistry.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Kishawi; Khaled Khalaf; Tracey Winning
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-02-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.