Literature DB >> 12410350

Minimal attachment killing (MAK): a versatile method for susceptibility testing of attached biofilm-positive and -negative Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Johannes K-M Knobloch1, Heimke Von Osten, Matthias A Horstkotte, Holger Rohde, Dietrich Mack.   

Abstract

Due to its ability to attach to polymeric surfaces Staphylococcus epidermidis is a common pathogen in chronic, medical device-associated infections. Attached S. epidermidis displays reduced susceptibility against a variety of antimicrobial substances, and little correlation between standard susceptibility test results and clinical outcome of antibiotic treatment is observed. In this study we established a new, versatile, and easy method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for attached Staphylococcus epidermidis, suitable for both biofilm-negative and biofilm-positive attached bacteria using readily available equipment. For three biofilm-positive wild-type strains and their biofilm-negative mutants minimal attachment killing concentrations (MAK) of penicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, and gentamicin were determined. Depending on strain and investigated antibiotics, a heterogeneous MAK (MAK(hetero)) could be differentiated from a homogeneous resistance (MAK(homo)), favoring a model of few persisters within attached cells under antibiotic treatment. For the biofilm-negative mutants, a lower MAK(homo) was detected than for the corresponding wild types for some of the tested antibiotics, which probably resulted from higher bacterial inocula of wild-type strains, whereas the MAK(hetero) were comparable for mutants and wild types for most of the tested antibiotics and strains. These data indicate that biofilm formation is not a necessary prerequisite for persistence of attached S. epidermidis cells under antibiotic treatment, which could explain therapeutic failure in foreign body-associated infections due to biofilm-negative S. epidermidis isolates. The highly individual resistance phenotypes of the investigated strains with different antibiotics suggests that MAK determination could help to predict the therapeutic outcome of foreign body-associated infections with both biofilm-positive and biofilm-negative S. epidermidis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410350     DOI: 10.1007/s00430-002-0125-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0300-8584            Impact factor:   3.402


  12 in total

1.  Determination of minimal regrowth concentration (MRC) in clinical isolates of various biofilm-forming bacteria.

Authors:  L Cernohorská; M Votava
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Disintegration of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms under glucose-limiting conditions depends on the activity of the alternative sigma factor sigmaB.

Authors:  Sebastian Jäger; Dietrich Mack; Holger Rohde; Matthias A Horstkotte; Johannes K-M Knobloch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  mecA is not involved in the sigmaB-dependent switch of the expression phenotype of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Johannes K-M Knobloch; Sebastian Jäger; Jörn Huck; Matthias A Horstkotte; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Filipe Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Antibiotic synergy against biofilm-forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  L Cernohorská; M Votava
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Permanent implantation of antibiotic cement over exposed instrumentation eradicates deep spinal infection.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Joseph M Lombardi; Jamal N Shillingford; Hemant P Reddy; Borys V Gvozdyev; Yong J Kim
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

7.  Effect of farnesol on structure and composition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Fernanda Gomes; Pilar Teixeira; Nuno Cerca; Joana Azeredo; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Inhibition of staphylococcal biofilm formation by nitrite.

Authors:  Steffen Schlag; Christiane Nerz; Timo A Birkenstock; Florian Altenberend; Friedrich Götz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Establishment of an arbitrary PCR for rapid identification of Tn917 insertion sites in Staphylococcus epidermidis: characterization of biofilm-negative and nonmucoid mutants.

Authors:  Johannes K-M Knobloch; Max Nedelmann; Kathrin Kiel; Katrin Bartscht; Matthias A Horstkotte; Sabine Dobinsky; Holger Rohde; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  RsbU-dependent regulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is mediated via the alternative sigma factor sigmaB by repression of the negative regulator gene icaR.

Authors:  Johannes K-M Knobloch; Sebastian Jäger; Matthias A Horstkotte; Holger Rohde; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.