Literature DB >> 12410309

Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing.

Gavin Sherman1, P Kirk Visscher.   

Abstract

The honeybee dance language, in which foragers perform dances containing information about the distance and direction to food sources, is the quintessential example of symbolic communication in non-primates. The dance language has been the subject of controversy, and of extensive research into the mechanisms of acquiring, decoding and evaluating the information in the dance. The dance language has been hypothesized, but not shown, to increase colony food collection. Here we show that colonies with disoriented dances (lacking direction information) recruit less effectively to syrup feeders than do colonies with oriented dances. For colonies foraging at natural sources, the direction information sometimes increases food collected, but at other times it makes no difference. The food-location information in the dance is presumably important when food sources are hard to find, variable in richness and ephemeral. Recruitment based simply on arousal of foragers and communication of floral odour, as occurs in honeybees, bumble bees and some stingless bees, can be equally effective under other circumstances. Clarifying the condition-dependent payoffs of the dance language provides new insight into its function in honeybee ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410309     DOI: 10.1038/nature01127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  40 in total

Review 1.  Experimental identification of social learning in wild animals.

Authors:  Simon M Reader; Dora Biro
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The hidden cost of information in collective foraging.

Authors:  François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Anna Dornhaus; Alasdair I Houston; John M McNamara; Edmund J Collins; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy.

Authors:  Takao Sasaki; Boris Granovskiy; Richard P Mann; David J T Sumpter; Stephen C Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies.

Authors:  Sachin Sarin; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evidence for instantaneous e-vector detection in the honeybee using an associative learning paradigm.

Authors:  Midori Sakura; Ryuichi Okada; Hitoshi Aonuma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Tandem Recruitment and Foraging in the Ponerine Ant Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius).

Authors:  C Grüter; M Wüst; A P Cipriano; F S Nascimento
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.434

7.  Adaptation or constraint? Reference-dependent scatter in honey bee dances.

Authors:  David A Tanner; P Kirk Visscher
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Does Imprecision in The Waggle Dance Fit Patterns Predicted by The Tuned-Error Hypothesis?

Authors:  David A Tanner; P Kirk Visscher
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.309

9.  How habitat affects the benefits of communication in collectively foraging honey bees.

Authors:  Matina C Donaldson-Matasci; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; M Sol Balbuena; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.