Literature DB >> 12409588

Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and preliminary results.

Kavita Garg1, Robert L Keith, Tim Byers, Karen Kelly, Anne L Kerzner, David A Lynch, York E Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial for lung cancer screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects are being recruited into a randomized controlled trial to undergo either low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) or observation. Subjects are from a high-risk group with known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sputum atypia and a moderate-risk group randomly selected from the general population of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. All subjects must be 50-80 years of age with 30 or more pack-years of cigarette smoking and must not have undergone chest CT during the previous 3 years. Baseline screening CT is performed with 50 mA, 120 kVp, 5-mm collimation, and a pitch of 2. CT scan interpretation and management of nodules is based on Society of Thoracic Radiology guidelines. The chi(2) test for categoric data was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: To date, 304 eligible subjects have been contacted, and 239 (79%) have agreed to participate in the trial. One hundred nineteen (88%) of the 136 subjects in the high-risk group and 120 (71%) of the 168 subjects in the moderate-risk group agreed to randomization (P <.001). To date, 190 subjects have been randomized. Of the first 92 subjects examined with CT, 22 (40%) of 55 in the high-risk group and eight (22%) of 37 in the moderate-risk group had one to six noncalcified nodules that required follow-up (P =.07). In all but three subjects, nodules were smaller than 5 mm. Two of the three larger nodules were malignancies.
CONCLUSION: Findings of this study indicate that a randomized controlled trial of CT to screen for lung cancer is feasible. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409588     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Prospective, multireader evaluation of image quality and vascular delineation of multislice CT angiography of the brain.

Authors:  Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Roland Bruening; Jeffrey Blume; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Brad Snyder; Karin A Herrmann; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Total-body MR-imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Juergen F Schaefer; Heinz-Peter W Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of non-contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR imaging for management of pulmonary nodules in 161 subjects.

Authors:  Hisanobu Koyama; Yoshiharu Ohno; Atsushi Kono; Daisuke Takenaka; Yoshimasa Maniwa; Yoshihiro Nishimura; Chiho Ohbayashi; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies.

Authors:  Ayman El-Baz; Garth M Beache; Georgy Gimel'farb; Kenji Suzuki; Kazunori Okada; Ahmed Elnakib; Ahmed Soliman; Behnoush Abdollahi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

Review 5.  Screening for lung cancer using low-dose computed tomography: concerns about the application in low-risk individuals.

Authors:  Jiu-Wei Cui; Wei Li; Fu-Jun Han; Yu-Di Liu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06

6.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muralikrishna Gopal; Shaad E Abdullah; James J Grady; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Smoking behavior 1 year after computed tomography screening for lung cancer: Effect of physician referral for abnormal CT findings.

Authors:  Mindi A Styn; Stephanie R Land; Kenneth A Perkins; David O Wilson; Marjorie Romkes; Joel L Weissfeld
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Population screening for lung cancer using computed tomography, is there evidence of clinical effectiveness? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Corri Black; Robyn de Verteuil; Shonagh Walker; Jon Ayres; Angela Boland; Adrian Bagust; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Sniffing the unique "odor print" of non-small-cell lung cancer with gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Orna Barash; Nir Peled; Fred R Hirsch; Hossam Haick
Journal:  Small       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.